Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics and dose fraction of 3871 patients in 25 studies with breast cancer after mastectomy

From: Comparing hypofractionated to conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postmastectomy breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Study (year published)

Sample size

Age (years)

Clinical stage

Interventions (Gy/fractions)

Outcomes

NOS

The type of RT technique

RT area and prescriptive method used

Bolus

Breast reconstruction

HFRT

CFRT

HFRT

CFRT

Wang (2019) [12]

401

409

24~74

II~III

43.5/15

50/25

OS, DFS, LRR, Toxicities

9

2DRT, 3DCRT, or IMRT

CW: a single appositional field with 6–9 MeV electron beam, depending on CW thickness

SPC: anteroposterior field using a 6 MV photon, combined 6 MV photon, and 9–15 MeV electron or a 10~12 MeV electron beam

5 mm bolus to CW

None

Abhilash (2016) [14]

30

30

25~67

II~III

39/13

50/25

LRR, Toxicities

6

2DRT

CW: bilateral tangent pair fields

SPC: a direct anterior field

Cobalt 60 teletherapy machine with gamma energy 1.25 MeV

NR

None

Bi (2011) [15]

51

49

28~64

II~III

43.5/15

50/25

OS, LRR, Toxicities

6

2DRT

CW: a 6~12 MeV electron beam

SPC: 12 MeV electron and 6 MV X-ray beams mixed

5 mm bolus to CW

None

Bedi (2018) [16]

30

30

39~61

II~III

42.5/16

50/25

Toxicities

5

3DCRT

CW: two tangential fields using 6 MV X-ray beam

SPC: a direct anterior field with 6 MV photon beam

Universal bolus to CW

None

Das (2018) [17]

55

53

48/50 a

I~III

42.56/16

50/25

DFS, LRR, DM, Toxicities

6

2DRT

CW: medial and lateral tangential fields

SPC: anteroposterior field

Cobalt 60 teletherapy machine

NR

None

Eldeeb (2012) [18]

66

41

25~67

I~III

45/17、40/15

50/25

LRR, Toxicities

7

2DRT

CW: two tangential fields

SPC and Axillary: an anterior field

6 MV photon linear accelerator or Cobalt 60 machine

NR

None

El-Sayed (2012) [19]

159

84

30~69

II~III

42.5/16、39/13

50/25

OS, DFS, LRR, Toxicities

7

2DRT

CW: medial and lateral tangential fields using 6 MV photon beam

SPC: anteroposterior field using 6 MV photon beam

NR

None

Elsayed (2014) [20]

25

22

33~70

II~III

42.72/16

50/25

OS, DFS, Toxicities

8

2DRT

CW and Axillary: two tangential fields using 6 MV photon beam

SPC: a direct anterior field using 6 MV photon beam

NR

None

Fatma (2018) [21]

50

50

31~68

II~III

40/15

50/25

DFS, LRR, Toxicities

7

3DCRT

CW: two tangential fields using 6 MV or 15 MV photon beam

SPC: an anterior field using 6 MV or 15 MV photon beam

NR

None

He (2016) [22]

48

63

25~57

I~II

40/15

50/25

Toxicities

6

3DCRT

CW and SPC: 6 MV photon beam

NR

None

Huang (2013) [23]

70

70

25~65

II~III

43.5/15

48.5/22

LRR

6

NR

RT area: CW and SPC

NR

None

Jin (2013) [24]

164

136

23~75

NR

45/15

50/25

OS, DM, LRR, Toxicities

6

NR

RT area: CW, SPC, Axillary, Axillary dome or internal mammary lymph node region if necessary

NR

None

Kalita (2018) [25]

25

25

27~70

II~III

40/15

50/25

Toxicities

5

2DRT,

CW: two parallel opposed tangential fields

SPC and Axillary: a separate direct anterior field

All fields using 6 MV photon beam

NR

None

Kouloulias (2016) [26]

87

30

33~78

II~III

48.3/21、42.56/16

50/25

Toxicities

7

3DCRT

CW and SPC using 6 MV photon beam

NR

None

Kumbhaj (2013) [27]

46

45

31~70

I~III

40/17

50/25

DFS, LRR, DM, Toxicities

6

2DRT,

CW: tangent pair technique by using Cobalt 60 machine;

SPC: NR

NR

None

Pinitpatcharalert (2011) [28]

148

67

44~56

I~III

42.72/16

50/25

OS, DFS, Toxicities

8

2DRT

CW: medial and lateral tangential chest wall fields

SPC: anteroposterior ipsilateral supraclavicular field

Axillary boost: clinical N2 disease, inadequate node excision (less than 10 nodes), or perinodal invasion

CW and SPC field were treated with cobalt 60

5 mm bolus to CW

None

Purohit (2016) [29]

25

25

18~65

II~III

40/15

50/25

Toxicities

6

2DRT

CW: medial tangential and lateral tangential fields

SPC: anteroposterior field

two field technique by using Cobalt 60 energy source

NR

None

Rastogi (2018) [30]

50

50

21~79

II~III

42.72/16

50/25

DFS, LRR, DM

7

3DCRT

CW and SPC: single beam energy, or a combination of both 6 and 15 MV photon beam was used depending on patients’ anatomy

 

None

Wang (2010) [31]

31

30

32~71

NR

41.6/13

50/25

OS, Toxicities

5

2DRT

CW and SPC: 12 MeV electron and 6 MV X-ray beams mixed, two parallel opposed tangential fields

NR

None

Wu (2003) [32]

177

149

26~74

I~III

45/15

50/25

OS, LRR

8

2DRT,

SPC, Axillary and Axillary dome: 8 MV X-ray, and the 20 Gy SPC was added with 1.5 cm bolus

Internal mammary: 14 MeV electron beam or mixed with 8 MV X-ray;

CW: tangent to 8 MV X-ray or 6–8 MeV electron beam

1.5 cm bolus to SPC

None

Wu (2014) [33]

53

53

31~68

II~IV b

42/15

50/25

NR

6

3DCRT

RT area: CW and SPC

NR

None

Yu (2011) [34]

175

171

21~76

II~III

45/15

50/25

NR

7

2DRT

SPC and Axillary: 4 MV X-ray by single anterior field, and the 20 Gy of total dose was added with 5 mm bolus

CW and internal mammary: 8 MV X-ray two parallel opposed tangential fields

all beams supplemented by 100–200 KV X-ray

5 mm bolus to SPC and Axillary

NR

Zhang (2015) [35]

36

30

24~68

II~III

43.5/15

50/25

Toxicities

5

3DCRT

Irradiation target area: CW and SPC

NR

None

Zhao (2014) [36]

41

44

18~70

II~III

42.56/16

50/25

LRR, DM, Toxicities

6

3DCRT

CW and SPC: two parallel opposed tangential fields by using 6 MV X-ray beam

NR

None

Zhao (2016) [37]

37

35

37~59

II~III

42.56/16

50/25

OS, LRR, DM, Toxicities

7

3DCRT

RT area: CW, SPC and Axillary, excluding the Internal mammary

6 MV X-ray beam

5 mm bolus to CW

None

  1. OS overall survival, LRR locoregional recurrence, DFS disease-free survival, DM distant metastasis, HFRT hypofractionated radiotherapy, CFRT conventional fractionated radiotherapy, RT radiotherapy, NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, 2DRT two-dimensional radiotherapy, 3DCRT three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, IMRT intensity-modulated radiotherapy, NR not reported, CW chest wall, SPC supraclavicular
  2. aMean age in HFRT group and CFRT group
  3. bOnly one stage IV case in the HFRT group