Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic information of included studies

From: The diagnostic value of quantitative analysis of ASL, DSC-MRI and DKI in the grading of cerebral gliomas: a meta-analysis

First author

Region

Average or median age

n

Gliomas grade(n)

Instrument Type and Field Strength

Technique

Diagnostic parameters

QUADAS-2

score

Arisawa 2018 [16]

Japan

50(19–74)

34

I + II(15),III + IV(19)

GE 3.0 T

ASL,DSC

rCBF,

rCBV

12

Cebeci 2014 [17]

Turkey

47 ± 14

33

I + II(13),III + IV(20)

Philips 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

13

Fudaba 2014 [18]

Japan

59.8 ± 16.8

32

II(9),III(8),IV(15)

Siemens 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

13

Furtner 2014 [19]

Australia

54 ± 17

33

II(7),III(7),IV(19)

Siemens 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

12

Jiang J 2014 [20]

China

42.7 ± 15.3

23

I + II(10),III + IV(13)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

12

Kim 2008 [21]

South Korea

43(19–74)

61

I + II(26),III + IV(35)

GE 1.5 T

ASL

rCBF

11

Liao H 2016 [22]

China

40.5

41

I + II(20),III + IV(21)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

11

Liu 2014 [23]

China

8–75

38

I(5),II(17),III(7),IV(9)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

12

Ma 2017 [24]

China

46 ± 18

50

I + II(27),III + IV(23)

GE 3.0 T

ASL,DSC

rCBF,

rCBV

11

Qiao F 2015 [25]

China

50(26–72)

28

I + II(11),III + IV(17)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

10

Roy 2013 [7]

India

43

64

I(3),II(23),III(9),IV(29)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

11

Shen 2016 [26]

China

42

52

I + II(25),III + IV(27)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

9

Tian Q 2015 [27]

China

47(19–76)

45

I + II(19),III + IV(26)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

12

Wang N 2019 [28]

China

48(23–81)

53

I(1),II(15),III(13),IV(24)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

10

Morana 2018 [29]

Italy

9(2–17)

37

I(8),II(14),III(6),IV(9)

Philips 1.5 T

ASL,DSC

rCBF,

rCBV

10

Wolf 2005 [30]

USA

50 ± 12

26

I + II(7),III + IV(19)

Siemens 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

10

Xiao 2015 [31]

China

43.3(6–74)

43

I + II(19),III + IV(24)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

11

Yang 2016 [32]

China

51 ± 15.34

43

II(15),III(15),IV(13)

Siemens 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

12

Zeng 2017 [33]

China

50 ± 13

58

II(13),III(17),IV(28)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

11

Zhao J 2016 [34]

China

42(15–64)

18

I + II(8),III + IV(10)

GE 3.0 T

ASL

rCBF

9

Van Cauter 2014 [35]

Belgium

55

31/

35

I + II(12),III + IV(19)-DSC

I + II(13),III + IV(22)-DKI

Philips 3.0 T

DSC

,DKI

rCBV,

MK

9

Awasthi 2012 [36]

India

16–65

76

I + II(21),III + IV(55)

GE 1.5 T

DSC

rCBV

12

Boxerman 2016 [37]

USA

52(19–80)

43

II(11),III(9),IV(23)

GE 1.5 T

DSC

rCBV

12

Brendle 2018 [38]

Germany

23–79

41

I + II(24),III + IV(17)

Siemens 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

14

Catalaa 2006 [39]

USA

23–78

17

II(8),III(9)

GE 1.5 T

DSC

rCBV

11

Cuccarini 2016 [40]

Italy

39.6 ± 12.6

68

I + II(42),III + IV(26)

Siemens 1.5 T

DSC

rCBV

12

Dallery 2017 [41]

France

9.4

(2.1–17.9)

30

I(7),II(4),III(7),IV(12)

GE 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

11

Falk 2014 [42]

Sweden

22–79

25

II(18),III(7)

Philips 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

10

Fatima 2014 [43]

Brazil

36.23±

16.95

38

I + II(16),III + IV(22)

GE 1.5 T

DSC

rCBV

13

Hilario 2012 [44]

Spain

23–79

162

II(32),III(29),IV(101)

GE 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

10

Huang 2015 [45]

China

45(17–72)

35

I(2),II(12),III(9),IV(12)

Siemens 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

9

Kim 2013 [46]

South Korea

35

63

II(9),III(16),IV(38)

Siemens 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

9

Law 2006 [47]

USA

42(4–85)

73

II(31),III(16),IV(26)

Siemens 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

11

Wang M 2011 [48]

China

42.9 ± 14.7

23

I(1),II(5),III(8),IV(9)

Siemens 3.0 T

ASL,DSC

rCBF,

rCBV

9

Nguyen 2016 [49]

Canada

54

43

I + II(10),III + IV(33)

Siemens 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

12

Santarosa 2016 [8]

Italy

55.4

(22–79)

26

II(9),III(4),IV(13)

Philips 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

9

Server 2011 [50]

Norway

57.73±

12.95

79

II(18),III(14),IV(47)

GE 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

10

Togao 2017 [51]

Japan

14–75

34

I + II(20),III + IV(14)

Philips 3.0 T

DSC

rCBV

12

Wang X 2016 [52]

China

41 ± 15

37

I + II(14),III + IV(23)

GE 3.0 T

ASL,DKI

rCBF,

MK

10

Falk Delgado 2017 [53]

Sweden

48 ± 15

35

II(23),III(12)

Philips 3.0 T

DKI

MK

10

Gao A 2017 [54]

China

48.66±

13.42

34

II(21),III(13)

Siemens 3.0 T

DKI

MK

10

Hempel 2017 [55]

USA

50 ± 14

50

II(25),III(15),IV(10)

Siemens 3.0 T

DKI

MK

11

Jiang 2015 [56]

China

41 ± 14

74

I(3),II(31),III(19),IV(21)

GE 3.0 T

DKI

MK

10

Li 2016 [57]

China

47

37

I + II(16),III + IV(21)

Siemens 3.0 T

DKI

MK

9

Lin 2018 [58]

China

42–75

96

I + II(84),III + IV(12)

GE 3.0 T

DKI

MK

10

Maximov 2017 [59]

Germany

18–59

24

II(8),III(8),IV(8)

GE 3.0 T

DKI

MK

11

Qi 2018 [60]

China

11–67

39

I + II(13),III + IV(26)

Siemens 3.0 T

DKI

MK

9

Raab 2010 [61]

Germany

56

18

II(5),III(13)

Siemens 3.0 T

DKI

MK

11

Raja 2016 [62]

Germany

35

18

II(9),III(9)

Philips 3.0 T

DKI

MK

12

Tan 2016 [63]

China

50

60

I + II(25),III + IV(35)

GE 3.0 T

DKI

MK

11

Tietze 2015 [64]

Denmark

42

34

II(12),III(7),IV(15)

Siemens 3.0 T

DKI

MK

10

Zheng G 2014 [65]

China

40.3 ± 19.5

21

I(2),II(3),III(7),IV(9)

GE 3.0 T

ASL,DSC

rCBF,

rCBV

10

Wang Y 2017 [66]

China

47.5

(25–75)

32

I + II(14),III + IV(18)

Siemens 3.0 T

DKI

MK

10

Zhao 2019 [67]

China

25–75

52

II(24),III(8),IV(20)

Siemens 3.0 T

DKI

MK

12