Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of LRR patterns between previous studies and the present study in patients without PMRT

From: Locoregional recurrence patterns in women with breast cancer who have not undergone post-mastectomy radiotherapy

Study

Treatment decade

No. of patients

Tumor stage

N stage

Axillary dissection

The median number of ALNs dissected

Adjuvant chemotherapy (regimens)

Endocrine therapy

Anti-Her2targeted therapy

LRR type (No. of patients)

CW

SCN

Axillary

IMN

Regional

Local + Regional

Truong, P. T. et al. [12]

1989–1999

1505

60.7%T1

39.3%T2

N0

100%

10

20.8%

48.4%

–

First (89)

68.5%

19.1%

24.7%

3.4%

31.5%

15.7%

Abi-Raad, R. et al. [11]

1980–2004

1136

75.3%T1

24.7%T2

N0

90%

14

14.6%

56.6%

–

First (58)

72.4%

13.8%

10.3%

6.9%

27.6%

1.7%

Hastings, J. et al. [13]

1994–2004

1259

T1

N0

–

11

24.2%

77.7%

–

Accumulated (33)

75.8%

9.1%

27.3%

0.0%

24.2%

12.1%

Li, J. L. et al. [14]

2001–2008

353

45.6%T1 54.4%T2

N0

100%

–

100%

unless contraindicated or intolerant

 –

First (39)

53.8%

48.7%

10.3%

2.6%

46.2%

15.4%

Sharma, Ranjna et al. [19]

1997–2002

1019

78.8%T1

21.2%T2

73.9%N0 26.1%N1

68.1%

16

41.6% (94.7% anthracycline- and/or taxane-based)

87.2%

 –

Accumulated (23)

52.1%

39.2%

4.3%

17.4%

47.8%

4.3%

Jwa, E. et al. [20]

2002–2011

390

58.5%T1 41.5%T2

78.7%N0 21.3%N1

–

6

54.4% (100% anthracycline- and/or taxane-based)

95.0%

8.9%

Accumulated (12)

50.0%

33.3%

33.3%

8.3%

–

–

Asaga, S. et al. [21]

–

428

49.5%T1 51.5%T2

N1

98.6%

16

67% (100% anthracycline- and/or taxane-based)

–

22.0%

First (20)

50.0%

35.0%

20.0%

5.0%

–

5.0%

wallgren et al. [22]

1978–1993

5352

T1–3N0–3

(41%T1)

24%N0

45%N1

31%N2/3

–

≥8

for high-risk patients (CMF)

Most post-menopausal patients with N+

 –

First (1138)

53%

26%

13%

1%

 –

7% (multiple sites)

Katz et al. [23]

1975–1994

1031

II-III

(80%T1–2

10%T3

10%Tx)

14%N0

45%N1

26%N2

15%N3

100%

17

100% (96% anthracycline- based)

68.2%

 –

Accumulated (179)

68%

47%

14%

8%

 –

 –

Rangan, A. M. et al. [24]

1980–1991

217

88.5%T1–2

7.8%T3

3.7%Tx

76%N1

24%N2

100%

14

100% (82%CMF)

50%

 –

First (42)

52.4%

40.5%

14.3%

7.1%

47.6%

9.5%

Taghian, A et al. [25]

1984–1994

5758

 –

51.4%N1

32.2%N2

16.1%N3

100%

16

100% (90.3% anthracycline- based)

 –

 –

Isolated (715)

56.9%

22.6%

11.7%

<1%

–

–

Nielsen et al. [26]

1982–1990

1545

II-III

 –

–

≥5

55.4%CMF

 –

–

Isolated (456)

57%

14%

45%

0%

43%

11%

Macdonald et al. [27]

1990–2004

165

T1–2N1

–

100%

14

62%

>90%

–

Accumulated (13)

77%

23%

38%

–

–

–

Trovo et al. [28]

1999–2005

150

I-II

54%N0

8%N1mic

37%N1a

97.3%

18

38.7% (75.9% anthracycline- based)

>90%

–

Accumulated (17)

64.7%

64.7%

–

–

–

29.4%

Muhsen, S et al. [29]

1995–2006

924

T1–2N1

–

94%

18

86% (76% anthracycline- and/or taxane-based)

100%

41%

First (56)

62.5%

25.0%

17.9%

5.4%

37.5%

8.9%

Chen et al. [30]

2001–2007

390

T1–2N0–1 Triple-negative

78.7%N0

21.3%N1

100%

–

86.4% (79.2% anthracycline- based)

–

–

Accumulated (31)

41.9%

29.0%

0.0%

6.5%

–

22.6%

Kuo et al. [31]

–

115

91.5%T1–2

–

–

–

–

–

–

Isolated (115)

65%

25%

15%

0%

–

–

Skinner et al. [32]

1994–2006

159

91.5%T1–2

13.2%T3–4

4.4%Tx

50.9%N0

32.7%N1

8.8%N2

5.0%N3

89%

–

61.6%

69.6%

–

Isolated (159)

77%

27%

13%

4%

–

–

Ma et al. [33]

2005–2013

235

91.5%T1–2

54.9%N0

33.6%N1

11.5%N2/3

100%

12

92.8% (83.9% anthracycline- and/or taxane-based)

94.6%

6.7%

Isolated (235)

48.5%

44.7%

14.0%

18.3%

51.5%

13.2%

Strom, E. A. et al. [5]

1975–1994

1031

83%T1–2

10%T3

7%Tx

14%N0

45%N1

41%N2/3

100%

17

doxorubicin-based

–

–

Accumulated (180)

67%

43%

12%

–

53%

–

Current study

1999–2014

7073

65.1%T1–2N0

29.7%T1–2N1

5.2%III

65.1%N0

30.3%N1

4.6%N2/3

95.2%

19

75.6% (86.9% anthracycline- and/or taxane-based)

84.4%

22.9%

Accumulated (469)

50.7%

50.3%

19.6%

10.7%

67.2%

17.9%