Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of patients (n = 103)

From: Investigating the loco-regional control of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with different radiation fraction sizes for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical outcomes and the application of an extended LQ/TCP model

Characteristics

No. of patients (%)

p value

All patients

Group A (n = 34)

Goup B (n = 34)

Group C (n = 35)

Sex

    

0.818

 Male

88 (85.4)

30 (88.2)

29 (85.3)

29 (82.9)

 

 Female

15 (14.6)

4 (11.8)

5 (14.7)

6 (17.1)

 

Age (year)

    

0.084

 Median

58

61

58

53

 

 Range

30 ~ 79

38 ~ 79

34 ~ 77

30 ~ 72

 

ECOG PS

    

0.569

 0–1

87 (84.5)

27 (79.4)

29 (85.3)

31 (88.6)

 

 2

16 (15.5)

7 (20.6)

5 (14.7)

4 (11.4)

 

Histology

    

0.315

 Squamous cell carcinoma

54 (52.4)

22 (64.7)

18 (52.9)

14 (40.0)

 

 Adenocarcinoma

45 (43.7)

10 (29.4)

15 (44.1)

20 (57.1)

 

 Adeno-squamous cell carcinoma

2 (1.9)

1 (2.9)

0 (0)

1 (2.9)

 

 Lymphoepithelioma like carcinoma

2 (1.9)

1 (2.9)

1 (2.9)

0 (0)

 

Clinical stage (7th edition)

    

0.229

 IIIA

39 (37.9)

9 (26.5)

14 (41.2)

16 (45.7)

 

 IIIB

64 (62.1)

25 (73.5)

20 (58.8)

19 (54.3)

 

Actual radiation dose (Gy)

    

0.259

 Median

63.8

63.5

63.9

64.0

 

 Range

55.6 ~ 69.3

57.2 ~ 65.9

59.5 ~ 69.3

55.6 ~ 68.2

 

Radiation fraction size (Gy)

    

< 0.001

Median

2.4

2.1

2.4

2.8

 

Range

2.0 ~ 3.1

2.0 ~ 2.2

2.2 ~ 2.5

2.5 ~ 3.1

 

Overall treatment time (weeks)

    

< 0.001

 Median

5.3

6.0

5.3

4.6

 

 Range

3.7 ~ 7.9

5.4 ~ 7.9

4.7 ~ 7.5

3.7 ~ 6.0

 

Concurrent chemotherapy

    

0.170

cisplatin + Paclitaxel/Docetaxel

73 (70.9)

20 (58.8)

25 (73.5)

28 (80.0)

 

 cisplatin + Pemetrexed

14 (13.6)

4 (11.8)

6 (17.6)

4 (11.4)

 

 cisplatin + Etoposide

2 (1.9)

1 (2.9)

1 (2.9)

0

 

Others

14 (13.6)

9 (26.5)

2 (5.9)

3 (8.6)

 
  1. Abbreviations: ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, BED Biological effective dose. Categories were compared using Chi-square test. Medians were compared using non-parametric test