Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological and patient characteristics of the included studies

From: The efficacy of positioning stents in preventing Oral complications after head and neck radiotherapy: a systematic literature review

Study

Year

Study design

Tumor location

Radiotherapy

Sample sizea

follow-up time

Drop out

Oral complications

Assessment tools

Mall et al. [17]

2016

RCT

Carcinoma of the posterior tongue

CRT

15/15

6 months

3/3

Xerostomia

(QLQ-H&N35) questionnaires and salivary flow rate

Nayar et al. [15]

2016

retrospective cohort study

Cancer on/near the mandible or maxilla

IMRT, CRT

24/33

2 months

0

Trismus

The maximal mouth opening

Verrone et al. [14]

2014

retrospective cohort study

SCC of the tongue and the floor of the mouth

IMRT

19/14

7 weeks

0

Mucositis

Mucositis severity (scored by the classification criteria of the World Health Organization)

Goel et al. [16]

2010

RCT

Posterior third of the tongue cancer

CRT

24/24

60 days

0

Dental caries, mucositis, dry mouth, salivary changes, taste alteration, dysphagia, trismus, and pain on swallowing

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group’s 045 head and neck cancer adverse events grading tool

Qin et al. [13]

2007

RCT

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

CRT

19/24

8 weeks

0

taste alteration, mucositis

Taste test and mucositis grade (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Version 2.0)

  1. asample size: study group size/control group size;