Skip to main content

Table 3 Dosimetric endpoint comparison between Cyberknife and VMAT plans

From: Benchmarking techniques for stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage glottic laryngeal cancer: LINAC-based non-coplanar VMAT vs. Cyberknife planning

Average (S.D.)

PTV Dmax (Gy)

Left/Right Carotid Artery Dmax (Gy)

Left/Right Carotid Artery Dmean (Gy)

Thyroid Gland Dmean (Gy)

Spinal Cord Dmax (Gy)

Skin Dmax (Gy)

 Cyberknife

48.3 (1.2)

13.9 (4.4)

6.6 (2.4)

4.3 (2.2)

5.8 (2.2)

41.4 (2.9)

 VMAT-AXB

46.5* (0.8)

12.7 (3.1)

7.1 (2.4)

2.4* (2.1)

8.2 (2.2)

41.3 (3.5)

 VMAT-AAA

46.6* (0.9)

12.9 (3.1)

7.1 (2.4)

2.7* (2.5)

7.9 (2.2)

40.1 (5.0)

Average (S.D.)

Contralateral Arytenoid Dmax (Gy)

R50

R20

Conformity index

MU

 

 Cyberknife

17.9 (4.8)

5.0 (0.6)

17.4 (3.0)

1.13 (0.07)

7333 (1934)

 VMAT-AXB

17.2 (2.9)

5.9* (0.8)

20.2 (3.2)

1.20 (0.10)

2095* (259)

 VMAT-AAA

15.2* (4.0)

5.7* (0.7)

19.2 (3.1)

1.19 (0.05)

2311* (343)

  1. The metric values were presented as the average of all ten patients studied, with numbers in brackets showing the standard deviations. The “*” mark was added when the difference between the Cyberknife and the VMAT-AXB or between the Cyberknife and the VMAT-AAA was statistically significant (p < 0.025)