Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of the GPR results

From: Comparison of gamma index based on dosimetric error and clinically relevant dose–volume index based on three-dimensional dose prediction in breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy

 

XiO

RayStation

 

Mean ± SD (range)

Mean ± SD (range)

P value

2D GPR

 3%/3 mm

98.1 ± 1.9

100.0 ± 0.1

p < 0.001

(93.5–100)

(99.5–100)

 3%/2 mm

95.2 ± 2.9

99.8 ± 0.5

p < 0.001

(86.5–99.0)

(97.7–100)

 2%/2 mm

93.3 ± 3.7

99.5 ± 0.8

p < 0.001

(82.4–98.7)

(95.7–100)

predicted 3D GPR

 3%/3 mm

91.3 ± 1.6

93.9 ± 1.0

p < 0.001

(88.6–94.5)

(91.8–96.2)

 3%/2 mm

85.9 ± 2.3

91.2 ± 1.1

p < 0.001

(82.2–91.0)

(89.0–93.5)

 2%/2 mm

82.1 ± 3.5 

89.5 ± 1.8 

p < 0.001

(77.2–87.8)

(86.1–92.3)

  1. 2D GPR averaged for all applicable fields. The predicted 3D GPR derived from each TPS (XiO or RayStaion)