From: Impact of beam configuration on VMAT plan quality for Pinnacle3Auto-Planning for head and neck cases
Comparison of techniques | p-value | Superior technique | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COV based | Scoring based | |||
1 | V2C15 vs. V1 C15 | 0,00009 * | 0,00009 * | V2C15 |
2 | V2C15 vs. 2V1C15 | 0,00012 * | 0,00054 * | V2C15 |
3 | V2C15 vs. V2C15_Part | 0,0047 * | 0,036 * | V2C15 |
4 | V2C15 vs. V2C40 | 0,12 | 0,78 | |
5 | V2C15 vs. V2C60 | 0,00078 * | 0,0083 * | V2C15 |
6 | V2C15 vs. 2V1C15_60 | 0,43 | 0,39 | |
7 | V2C15 vs. 2V1C15_345 | 0,01 * | 0,041 * | V2C15 |
8 | 2V1C15_60 vs. 2V1C15_345 | 0,0051 * | 0,22 | 2V1C15_60 |