Radiation Oncology

Table 3 Average coverage in each metric using the conventional and OAR grouping method over all adapted fractions for each patient

From: Optimization of treatment planning workflow and tumor coverage during daily adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) of pancreatic cancer

Adapted Fractions	Method	Average Coverage (%)
		PTV OPT	PTV
		D₉₅	D₉₅	D₁₀₀
Patient 1
14	Conventional	94.00	77.36	66.47
14	Proposed	95.78	79.64	69.68
Patient 2
13	Conventional	99.91	82.56	77.97
13	Proposed	99.65	83.26	79.39
Patient 3
13	Conventional	94.88	84.36	78.89
13	Proposed	96.85	86.40	80.13
Patient 4
15	Conventional	94.59	81.38	72.19
15	Proposed	99.48	87.88	84.24
Patient 5
14	Conventional	76.44	48.50	40.42
14	Proposed	78.49	49.99	43.29
Patient 6
15	Conventional	67.46	49.16	39.64
15	Proposed	72.62	53.08	43.93
Patient 7
14	Conventional	78.52	76.54	63.09
14	Proposed	82.32	80.37	69.21
Patient 8
10	Conventional	61.22	52.98	42.57
10	Proposed	59.21	51.30	41.78
Patient 9
13	Conventional	81.40	67.92	51.71
13	Proposed	91.22	76.20	63.37
Patient 10
14	Conventional	86.66	70.10	53.97
14	Proposed	95.60	79.10	67.78
Patient 11
14	Conventional	93.75	70.75	60.51
14	Proposed	95.66	72.79	65.45
Patient 12
11	Conventional	90.12	80.60	61.67
11	Proposed	97.30	87.89	80.22
Patient 13
6	Conventional	84.32	61.43	45.89
6	Proposed	97.99	72.68	62.57
Patient 14
13	Conventional	75.07	51.83	44.00
13	Proposed	72.37	50.12	41.84
Patient 15
14	Conventional	75.01	59.78	49.55
14	Proposed	74.62	59.49	50.00
Patient 16
15	Conventional	79.60	62.28	52.99
15	Proposed	82.27	64.54	54.92

Back to article page

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com