Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and demographics

From: Comparison of the clinical efficacy between single-agent and dual-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Variable

Single-agent No. (%)

Two-agent No. (%)

p-value

Total patients

100

68

 

Age at diagnosis (years)

  

0.037

Mean ± SD

62.75 ± 7.80

58.32 ± 9.17

 

(Range)

(41–80)

(36–79)

 

 ≥65

44(44)

  

 < 65

56(56)

21(31)

0.087

  

47(69)

 

Sex

  

0.717

 Male

76(76)

50(74)

 

 Female

24(24)

18(26)

 

Location

  

0.479

 Cervical

5(5)

3(4)

 

 Upper thoracic

34(34)

23(34)

 

 Middle thoracic

48(48)

34(50)

 

 Lower thoracic

13(13)

8(12)

 

ECOG PS

  

0.069

 0

30(30)

32(47)

 

 1

64(64)

34(50)

 

 2

6(6)

2(3)

 

Tumor stag

  

0.896

 T1

10(10)

8(12)

 

 T2

38(38)

22(32)

 

 T3

31(31)

23(34)

 

 T4

21(21)

15(22)

 

Node stage

  

0.360

 N0

56(56)

31(46)

 

 N1

24(24)

18(26)

 

 N2

20(20)

19(28)

 

Clinical stage

  

0.814

 I

24(24)

15(22)

 

 II

44(44)

28(41)

 

 III

32(32)

25(37)

 

Radiotherapy dose (Gy)

  

0.21

Mean ± SD

60.74 ± 3.46

61.97 ± 3.28

 

(Range)

(50–68)

(54–70)

 

 > 60

26(26)

26(38)

0.092

 (50–60)

74(74)

42(62)

 

Chemotherapy regimens

 5-FU

23(23)

  

 Capecitabine

10(10)

  

 S-1

37(37)

  

 Cisplatin

25(25)

  

 Nadeplatin

5(5)

  

 Paclitaxel + Cisplatin

 

12(17)

 

 Paclitaxel + carboplatin

 

9(13)

 

 Docetaxel+ Cisplatin

 

6(9)

 

 5-FU+ Cisplatin

 

17(25)

 

 5-FU+ Oxaliplatin

 

5(7)

 

 S-1 + Cisplatin

 

12(18)

 

 Capecitabine+ Cisplatin

 

7(10)

 
  1. SD standard deviation