Skip to main content

Table 2 The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) Criteria was used to assess the level of evidence for each outcome

From: Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcomes

Type of Evidence

Quality

Consistency

Directness

Effect Size

Total

Overall Quality

Local Control

+2

−2

0

0

0

0

Very low

Distant Progression

+2

−2

0

0

0

0

Very low

LMD

+2

−2

−1

0

+1

0

Very low

Overall Survival

+2

−2

−1

0

0

−1

Very low

  1. Type of evidence is based on the study design of the included studies and ranges from +2 to +4. Study quality is graded based on blinding and allocation, follow up and withdrawals, sparsity of data, or methodological concerns and ranges from −3 to 0. Consistency is graded based on heterogeneity of populations and study end points with respect to one another and included populations and ranges from −1 to +1. Directness is graded based on generalizability of the included results and is graded from −2 to 0. Effect size is graded on the value of the RR or OR and is graded from 0 to +2. The overall quality of the recommendations that can be made based on the included studies includes the following categories: high (at least 4 points overall), moderate (3 points), low (2 points), and very low (1 point or less)