Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of the calculated ITVWEPL by: volume comparison with the ITVG5 (mean, minimum and maximum are shown); directional expansion relative to the CTV (HD95%); COM variation relative to the CTV. The reported values as Q25% and Q75% correspond respectively to the first and third quartiles of the data

From: Planning strategies for inter-fractional robustness in pancreatic patients treated with scanned carbon therapy

 

ITVWEPL Characterization

Beam Configuration (A-F)

ΔV ITV5-ITVWEPL

CTV expansion (mm)

ΔCOM. Depth (mm)

ΔCOM. Lateral (mm)

Mean (%)

[Min-Max] (%)

(Q75% of HD95%)

[Q25%;Q75%]

[Q25%;Q75%]

A, F1

−28.0

[−35.3,-22.6]

4.5

[−1.2; −0.3]

[−0.2;0.3]

B,E2

−27.9

[−36.5,-22.1]

4.5

[−0.8 -0.5]

[0;0.2]

C

−16.9

[−30.5,-8.4]

10

[−5.3;2.8]

[−0.2;0.5]

D,E1

−26.9

[−37.2,-15.5]

6.8

[−3.1;0.4]

[0.1;0.7]

F2

−28.7

[−35.9,-21.4]

5.0

[−0.7;0.7]

[−0.1;0.5]