Skip to main content

Table 2 The summary of the quantitative analysis of the OARs sparing for the entire evaluation group for each planner

From: Is it possible for knowledge-based planning to improve intensity modulated radiation therapy plan quality for planners with different planning experiences in left-sided breast cancer patients?

Planner

Plan

Heart

Ipsilateral lung

Contralateral breast

Contralateral lung

V5 (%)

V20 (%)

V30 (%)

Mean dose (Gy)

V5 (%)

V20 (%)

V30 (%)

Mean dose (Gy)

Mean dose (Gy)

Mean dose (Gy)

Beginner planner A

Manual plan

39.80

10.89

5.73

7.50

58.13

18.42

12.09

11.60

0.43

0.20

KBP plan

36.87

7.49

4.23

6.62

51.56

16.59

11.15

11.43

0.47

0.20

p value

0.002

<0.0001

0.001

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.33

0.32

0.95

Beginner planner B

Manual plan

39.37

11.28

6.03

7.52

58.15

18.31

12.12

11.85

0.47

0.20

KBP plan

37.73

7.80

4.13

6.63

53.46

16.21

10.52

11.47

0.48

0.16

p value

0.30

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.01

0.002

0.004

0.21

0.20

0.06

Junior planner A

Manual plan

36.46

10.25

5.33

6.99

52.3

19.16

12.82

11.70

0.49

0.17

KBP plan

33.85

9.73

5.30

6.61

50.52

18.88

12.49

11.51

0.43

0.17

p value

<0.0001

0.04

0.87

<0.0001

0.03

0.32

0.44

0.41

0.18

0.17

Junior planner B

Manual plan

35.36

10.41

5.54

7.00

53.75

18.56

11.94

11.78

0.41

0.17

KBP plan

34.63

9.63

5.20

6.6

51.92

17.98

11.75

11.41

0.41

0.17

p value

0.23

0.02

0.04

<0.0001

0.02

0.10

0.42

0.05

0.88

0.82

Senior planner A

Manual plan

36.58

8.00

4.53

6.72

53.76

18.51

12.76

11.79

0.46

0.22

KBP plan

37.80

7.76

4.64

6.63

54.42

18.63

12.73

11.94

0.47

0.19

p value

0.06

0.23

0.41

0.14

0.39

0.70

0.91

0.48

0.24

0.27

Senior planner B

Manual plan

36.78

7.98

4.59

6.70

54.07

17.97

12.16

11.74

0.47

0.21

KBP plan

37.00

7.74

4.58

6.55

54.32

17.8

12.07

11.73

0.47

0.19

p value

0.71

0.40

0.90

0.02

0.77

0.60

0.68

0.98

0.70

0.15

  1. Data shown are the averages of the respective parameters for the 10 patients