Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of non-coplanar techniques to the reference coplanar technique

From: Characteristics of non-coplanar IMRT in the presence of target-embedded organs at risk

  

Type I

Type II

  

Fluence (Fig. 5)

120 segments (Fig. 6a)

64 segments (Fig. 6a)

Fluence (Fig. 5)

  

A

C

A

C

A

C

B

   

Min

Max

    

Min

Max

9-10 beams

a

+

++

− −

− −

− −

− −

++

+

b

+

+

+

Ο

+(+)

c

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

d

++

++

++

Ο

++

Ο

++

++

++

15-16 beams

a

+

+

++

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

++

++

b

++

+(+)

Ο

Ο

+

+

+(+)

+

c

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο

d

+

++

+

Ο

Ο

+

+

++

++

  1. Recommendations for the choice of technique, following Figs. 5 and 6, for types of PTV-OAR-topologies (Fig. 1)
  2. o equivalent, + better, ++ best choice, etc
  3. Techniques/beam sets:
  4. a) quasi-isotropic non-coplanar (Q4π)
  5. b) beams arranged in two orthogonal planes (2P)
  6. c) coplanar (Co; reference)
  7. d) coplanar + 1 orthogonal beam (Co + 1)
  8. “Min” refers to best and “Max” to the most unfavourable orientation of a given beam set (a, b, c, or d), respectively
  9. (++ in the “Max” column means: the worst result for the considered technique was much better than the most unfavourable result for the reference technique)