Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of mean DVH parameters of pelvic bone between 3DCRT and IMRT

From: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy with concurrent nedaplatin-based chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer: comparison of outcomes, complications, and dose-volume histogram parameters

 

3DCRT

IMRT

 
 

Mean

SD

SE

Mean

SD

SE

p

(%)

       

V10

90.5

9.0

1.6

92.3

2.8

0.5

0.724

V15

87.9

8.9

1.6

88.2

3.0

0.6

0.054

V20

85.7

8.8

1.5

80.4

4.2

0.8

<0.001

V30

65.2

6.1

1.1

66.2

4.4

0.8

0.341

V40

45.6

6.0

1.1

50.0

6.5

1.2

0.003

V45

38.7

6.8

1.2

38.1

7.3

1.3

0.827

(cc)

       

V10

1001

154

27

1008

128

12

0.983

V15

972

149

26

965

130

24

0.568

V20

947

145

26

879

128

23

0.019

V30

719

98

17

721

103

19

0.827

V40

499

54

10

544

96

18

0.042

V45

424

65

11

415

94

17

0.849

  1. DVH dose-volume histogram, 3DCRT three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, IMRT intensity-modulated radiation therapy, SD standard deviation, SE standard error, V10-45 volume receiving more than respective dose