Comparative dosimetric findings using accelerated partial breast irradiation across five catheter subtypes

Radiation Oncology

Table 4 Comparison of D₉₀ and D₉₅ between APBI devices

	(I) Applicator	(J) Applicator	Mean Difference (I–J)	Std. Error	p
D₉₀	Single-lumen	Multi-lumen	3.1699	1.04264	.002
		Savi	−4.1677	.89960	< .001
		Savi-mini	−3.1167	.89741	.001
	Multi-lumen	Single-lumen	−3.1699	1.04264	.002
		Savi	−7.3376	.69028	< .001
		Savi-mini	−6.2866	.68743	< .001
	Savi	Single-lumen	4.1677	.89960	< .001
		Multi-lumen	7.3376	.69028	< .001
		Savi-mini	1.0510	.44129	.018
	Savi-mini	Single-lumen	3.1167	.89741	.001
		Multi-lumen	6.2866	.68743	< .001
		Savi	−1.0510	.44129	.018
D₉₅	Single-lumen	Multi-lumen	5.6730	1.29051	< .001
		Savi	−.3506	1.11346	.753
		Savi-mini	1.6171	1.11076	.146
	Multi-lumen	Single-lumen	−5.6730	1.29051	< .001
		Savi	−6.0236	.85439	< .001
		Savi-mini	−4.0559	.85086	< .001
	Savi	Single-lumen	.3506	1.11346	.753
		Multi-lumen	6.0236	.85439	< .001
		Savi-mini	1.9677	.54620	< .001
	Savi-mini	Single-lumen	−1.6171	1.11076	.146
		Multi-lumen	4.0559	.85086	< .001
		Savi	−1.9677	.54620	< .001

ISSN: 1748-717X