Author, Year* | Country | n | RP endpoint | Prognostic groups | Test type (results) | p value | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lind et al. 1994– 1998 [20] | Duke’s | 613 | Clinical RP, Grade > 2 | Median age | Mann–Whitney test | 0.64 | RP > Grade 2 only (retrospective) |
(RP- vs RP+) | (54.9Â yrs vs 55.2Â yrs) | ||||||
Lind et al. 1994– 1998 [17] | Sweden | 180 | Clinical RP CTC-NCIC | Mean age | Students t-test | <0.001 | Loco-regional RT after mastectomy |
(RP- vs RP+) | (55.4Â yrs vs 62.6Â yrs) | ||||||
Kahan et al. 2001 – 2004 [31] | Hungary | 119 | Radiological RP – CTC 2.0 | Mean age | Student’s t-test | 0.012 | - |
(RP- vs RP+) | (56.2Â yrs vs 61.5Â yrs) | ||||||
Jaen et al. 2002 [44] | Spain | 39 | Perfused lung volume (%) | ≤55 yrs, >55 yrs | Box plot: ≤55 yrs vs >55 yrs | NS | Reduced perfusion in older age group |
Kubo et al. 2005 – 2007 [24] | Japan | 413 | Radiological RP – CTC/AE 3.0 | ≤50 yrs,>50 yrs | Cox regression model | 0.20 | Only tangential whole breast irradiation |
(RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.49 – 1.2) |