Table 9 Summary of differences between treatment plan and radiobiological parameters from the two algorithms for prostate treatment

PTV

D_2%(Gy)

77.6

1.6

78.7

1.6

<0.001

D_95%(Gy)

75.3

1.6

76.2

1.5

<0.001

D_mean(Gy)

76.5

1.5

77.4

1.6

<0.001

II(%)

3.2

0.1

3.2

0.2

0.416

TCP(%)_{α/β 1.49}

81.9

5.1

83.9

4.3

<0.001

TCP(%)_{α/β 10.0}

93.8

6.5

95.7

5.0

<0.001

Rectum

D_2%(Gy)

74.3

1.6

77.0

2.0

<0.001

D_50%(Gy)

41.7

6.5

40.7

6.8

<0.001

D_95%(Gy)

21.1

4.8

18.6

4.7

<0.001

D_mean(Gy)

44.6

6.2

43.9

6.6

0.002

LKB model

NTCP (%)

Ref.

Rancati et al. [62]

3.3

1.9

3.9

2.5

0.005

Rancati et al. [62]

0.5

0.6

1.5

2.0

0.006

Tucker et al. [45]

9.2

2.2

11.5

2.3

<0.001

Peeters et al. [63]

3.1

1.9

4.1

2.9

<0.001

Söhn et al. [47]

4.5

1.8

6.4

2.6

<0.001

Rancati et al. [46]

9.1

2.2

11.1

2.2

<0.001

Seriality model

Rancati et al. [62]

3.0

1.8

3.5

2.4

0.013

Femoral heads

D_2%(Gy)

55.2

3.6

54.5

3.8

0.104

D_50%(Gy)

44.6

6.9

43.6

7.3

<0.001

D_80%(Gy)

26.1

5.7

25.1

6.0

<0.001

LKB model

NTCP(%)

Ref.

Emami et al. [39] / Burman et al. [23]

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

<0.001