Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics of papers analyzed

From: Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author, [Reference]

Country

Prescribed dose, Gy

Sample size

Organs at risk

Level of the dose, Gy

IMRT*

3D-CRT+

Heron DE [26]

USA

45

10

10

Rectum, Small bowel, Bladder

10, 20, 30, 40, 45

Chen MF [36]

Taiwan

50.4

33

35

Rectum, Small bowel, Bladder, Bone marrow

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45

Mell LK [30]

USA

45

7

7

Rectum, Small bowel, Bladder, Bone marrow

5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 45

Igdem S [31]

Turkey

45 or 50.4

10

10

Rectum, Small bowel, Bladder, Bone marrow

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 45

Roeske JC [37]

USA

45

10

10

Rectum, Small bowel, Bladder

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45

Portelance L [17]

USA

45

10

10

Rectum, Small bowel, Bladder

45

Lujan AE [38]

USA

45

10

10

Bone marrow

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45

Brixey CJ [39]

USA

45

36

88

Iliac crest, Lumbar spine, Sacrum

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45

Ahmed RS [27]

USA

45

5

5

Bone marrow

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45

Mell LK [37]

USA

45

37

0

Bone marrow

10, 20, 30, 40

Mundt AJ [38]

USA

45

36

30

Small bowel

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45

Salama JK [40]

USA

45

13

13

Rectum, Small bowel

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45

Georg D [41]

Austria

50.4

5

5

Rectum, Small bowel, Bladder

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45

  1. * intensity modulated radiotherapy; + three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.