Skip to main content

Table 2 Prior studies examining SRS for brainstem metastases

From: Prescription dose and fractionation predict improved survival after stereotactic radiotherapy for brainstem metastases

Study

Treatment modality

Patients, n

Mean age, y

Median tumor volume, mL

Median prescribed SRS Dose, Gy

Median survival, mo

Local tumor control, %

Factors associated With shorter survival

Complication rate

Huang et al. [8]

Gamma Knife

26

56

1.1

16

9

95

Presence of active extracranial disease

27%

Shuto et al. [13]

Gamma Knife

25

57.1

2.1 (mean)

13 (mean)

4.9

77

N/A

8%

Fuentes et al. [6]

Gamma Knife

28

57.7

2.1 (mean)

19.6 (mean)

12

92

N/A

0%

Yen et al. [14]

Gamma Knife

53

57.3

2.8 (mean)

17.6 (mean)

11

87

Presence of extracranial disease

0%

Hussain et al. [9]

Gamma Knife

22

60 (median)

0.9

16

8.5

100

N/A

5%

Kased et al. [10]

Gamma Knife

42

55 (median)

0.26

16

9

85

Multiple metastases, melanoma primary

10%

Lorenzoni et al. [15]

Gamma Knife

25

54

0.6 (mean)

20 (mean)

11.1

95

KPS <80, uncontrolled primary tumor, radiotherapy, SRS < 18 Gy

0%

Koyfman et al. [11]

Gamma Knife

43

59 (median)

0.37

15

5.8

85

Lower KPS, larger tumor volume, SIR, GPA

12%

Hatiboglu et al. [7]

Linac-based SRT/SRS

60

61 (median)

1

15

4.2

76

Tumor volume ≥4 mL, male sex

20%

Lin et al. [12]

Linac-based SRT/SRS

45

59.9

0.4

14

11.6

91

Lower KPS

4%

Present Study

Linac-based SRT/SRS

36

61

0.94

17

3

93

Lower GPA, lower prescription dose, fewer fractions

8%