Skip to main content

Table 1 Estimated positioning uncertainties CT resp. MR based treatment procedure

From: Systematisation of spatial uncertainties for comparison between a MR and a CT-based radiotherapy workflow for prostate treatments

 

CT based workflow

MR based workflow

 

CT/MR-systematic

CT/MR-Random

MR-systematic

MR-random

Contributing factor

ΣRL mm

ΣAP mm

ΣHF mm

σRL Mm

σAP mm

σgHF mm

ΣRL mm

ΣAP mm

ΣHF mm

σRL mm

σAP mm

σHF mm

Prostate delineation

1.8

1.8

2.8

-----

-----

-----

1.8

1.8

2.8

-----

-----

-----

Geometrical distortions

0.2

0.2

0.2

-----

-----

-----

0.2

0.2

0.2

-----

-----

-----

MR to CT registration

2

2

2

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

Total treatment planning uncertainty

2.7

2.7

3.4

-----

-----

-----

1.8

1.8

2.8

-----

-----

-----

Intra-fraction motion

-----

-----

-----

0.4

1.4

1.4

-----

-----

-----

0.4

1.4

1.4

CT to X-ray registration

-----

-----

-----

0.7

0.7

1.4

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

Fidutial marker uncertainty

1.0

1.0

1.0

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

X-ray Imaging uncertainty

1.0

1.0

1.0

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

MR Imaging uncertainty/distortion

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

MR to MR registration

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

0.5

0.5

1.25

Calibration vector determination

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

0.1

0.2

0.1

-----

-----

-----

Weight correction

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

0.6

0.2

-----

-----

-----

Docking mechanism

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

0.5

-----

-----

0.7

Total Set-up uncertainty

1.4

1.4

1.4

0.8

1.6

2.0

0.5

0.8

0.7

0.8

1.6

2.1

Total uncertainty

3.0

3.0

3.7

0.8

1.6

2.0

1.9

2.0

2.9

0.8

1.6

2.1