Table 1 Comparison with historic conventional postoperative three-dimensional radiation therapy (p3DCRT) data
2-year control rates | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author reference) | n | risk level | % LRC | % DFS | % OAS | % high risk | pRT technique | pRT dose | cc ChTh |
Aug et al [5] | 151 | HR | ~72 | na | ~60 | 100% | 3dcrt | 63 Gy | no |
62 | LR, IR | ~95 | na | ~90 | 0% | 3dcrt | LR: no RT, IR: 57.6 Gy | no | |
Cooper et al [4] | 228 | HR | ~83 | ~55 | ~65 | 100% | 3dcrt | 60–66 Gy in 30–33 f | yes |
231 | HR | ~72 | ~50 | ~55 | 100% | 3dcrt | 60–66 Gy in 30–33 f | no | |
Bernier et al [3] | 167 | HR | ~82 | ~67 | ~75 | > 60% | 3dcrt | 66 Gy in 33 f | yes |
167 | HR | ~70 | ~48 | ~61 | > 60% | 3dcrt | 66 Gy in 33 f | no | |
Bachaud et al [2] | 39 | HR | 79 | 65 | 75 | 100% | 3dcrt | NA | yes |
44 | HR | 59 | 41 | 44 | 100% | 3dcrt | NA | no | |
Porceddu et al [13] | 47 | HR | ~73 | ~56 | ~62 | 100% | 3dcrt | mean 60 Gy (50–66) | yes |
own | 60 | HR | 92 | 90 | 81 | 100% | IMRT | 60–70 Gy in 27–35 f | most (>80%) |
11 | IR | 100 | 90 | 90 | 0% | IMRT | 60–70 Gy in 27–35 f | most (>80%) | |