Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with skull base metastases from systemic cancer involving the anterior visual pathway
© Minniti et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 29 January 2014
Accepted: 16 March 2014
Published: 8 May 2014
To analyze the tumor control, survival outcomes, and toxicity after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for skull base metastases from systemic cancer involving the anterior visual pathway.
Patients and methods
We have analyzed 34 patients (23 females and 11 males, median age 59 years) who underwent multi-fraction SRS for a skull base metastasis compressing or in close proximity of optic nerves and chiasm. All metastases were treated with frameless LINAC-based multi-fraction SRS in 5 daily fractions of 5 Gy each. Local control, distant failure, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method calculated from the time of SRS. Prognostic variables were assessed using log-rank and Cox regression analyses.
At a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 2–36.5 months), twenty-five patients had died and 9 were alive. The 1-year and 2-year local control rates were 89% and 72%, and respective actuarial survival rates were 63% and 30%. Four patients recurred with a median time to progression of 12 months (range, 6–27 months), and 17 patients had new brain metastases at distant brain sites. The 1-year and 2-year distant failure rates were 50% and 77%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >70 and the absence of extracranial metastases were prognostic factors associated with lower distant failure rates and longer survival. After multi-fraction SRS, 15 (51%) out of 29 patients had a clinical improvement of their preexisting cranial deficits. No patients developed radiation-induced optic neuropathy during the follow-up.
Multi-fraction SRS (5 x 5 Gy) is a safe treatment option associated with good local control and improved cranial nerve symptoms for patients with a skull base metastasis involving the anterior visual pathway.
KeywordsStereotactic radiosurgery Skull base metastases Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery Radiation-induced optic neuropathy
The base of the skull is a less common site of metastases; however, they represent a clinical challenge as growing lesions in such area that compress optic nerve, chiasm, and nerves involved in the extraocular movement have been associated with serious morbidity . Therapeutic options include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. Surgical resection is reserved for a minority of well-selected patients, depending on the accessibility of the lesion and the potential morbidity of the procedure . Similarly, chemotherapy may have a role only in a subset of patients with chemosensitive or hormonosensitive lesions . Palliative radiotherapy with doses of 20–30 Gy in 5–10 fractions results in significant symptom improvement [4–9], although in clinical practice many physicians prefer to withhold whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) since it may result in a decline of neurocognitive function and quality of life [10, 11].
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), which has been used for nearly 30 years in patients with a limited number of brain metastases, is an effective treatment associated with excellent local control without compromising survival, and potentially avoiding the risk of the detrimental neurocognitive effects of WBRT [12, 13]. Few series including either skull base metastases or head and neck cancers have reported a 1-year local control of 53%-89% after single-fraction SRS [14–17]. However, single large doses may be associated with an increased risk for neurologic morbidity from radiation necrosis [18–20], and this is of concern especially for lesions larger than 2.5-3.0 cm or of any size that are in close proximity to critical structures, such as the optic apparatus or brainstem in case of metastases of the skull base. Thus, multi-fraction SRS (up to 5 fractions) has been employed in patients with brain metastases as an alternative to single-fraction SRS with the aim to reduce late radiation-induced toxicity while maintaining high local control rate. Differing from single-fraction SRS where patients have been traditionally immobilized in an invasive frame, a stereotactic mask is usually employed for multi-fraction SRS with a setup accuracy of 0–3 mm. In patients with brain metastases multi-fraction SRS at doses of 27–42 Gy in 3–5 fractions has resulted in 1-year local control of 70-90% with acceptable radiation-induced toxicity [21–25], although the efficacy and safety of this approach in patients with a skull base metastasis remains to be determined.
In the present study we reviewed our experience with SRS given in five daily fractions in patients with skull base metastases from systemic cancer involving the anterior visual pathway. Local control, neurologic outcome and risk of radiation-induced neuropathies have been evaluated.
Patients and methods
Patient data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database of patients with brain tumors treated with brain stereotactic irradiation at our institution. We identified 34 consecutive patients who received multi-fraction SRS for a sellar and/or parasellar metastasis adjacent or compressing the optic chiasm and/or optic nerves derived from different histologically confirmed systemic cancers. They represent the 2.3% of all patients with brain metastases treated with SRS between March 2005 and August 2013 at University of Rome Sapienza, Sant’Andrea Hospital. All patients were aged 18 years or older with no prior WBRT. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to treatment. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
Patients were examined clinically before SRS and then every 2 months. At each visit, neurological status and the severity of complications were rated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE) central nervous system toxicity. Ophthalmologic examinations including visual acuity assessment and visual field testing were performed every 3 months. MRI was made every 2 months in the first year after treatment, and then every 3 months or as appropriate according to the neurological conditions. Complete response was defined as total radiographic disappearance of enhancing lesion, partial response as shrinkage of tumor volume >50%, and stable disease as reduction in the tumor volume ≤50%. Local progression was defined as radiographic increase in the volume of metastatic lesion on serial imaging. In patients with suspected local progression, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion MRI and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-F-fluoro-l-phenylalanine (F-FDOPA) PET/CT were used for differential diagnosis between recurrent tumor and radiation-induced brain necrosis. Distant intracranial progression was defined by presence of new brain metastases or leptomeningeal enhancement outside the irradiated volume. All images were reviewed by the same neuroradiologist (A.B). Tumor volumetry was performed by using the BrainLab iPlan treatment planning software and changes in tumor volume were calculated after fusion of pre-treatment and post-treatment MRI scans. Metastatic lesions were manually contoured by the same radiation oncologist (G.M) using postcontrast axial T1-weighted images with 1 mm slice thickness. For all patients who died, the cause of death (intracranial versus extracranial progression) was determined by clinical/neurological evaluation and brain/systemic radiologic studies.
Local control, distant failure, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method calculated from the time of multi-fraction SRS. For univariate analysis, the log-rank test was used for categorical variables, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for continuous variables. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to test the independent effect of significant prognostic factors at univariate analysis (p <0.05).
Patient and treatment characteristics
Summary of patient characteristics
Number of patients
≥ 65 years
Number of metastases
CS and retrorbital space
CS and clivus
CS and/or sellar/suprasellar space
CS and petrus bone
GTV (cm 3 )
1.9 - 25.8
PTV (cm 3 )
3.4 - 35.8
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival and distant failure
Survival time (months)
Analysis P value
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Sex, male vs female
male (16.1); female (13.5)
Age (years), < 65 vs ≥ 65
< 65 (15.0); ≥ 65 (11.5)
KPS, ≤ 70 vs >70
≤ 70 (11.5); >70 (20.3)
Primary tumor, breast cancer vs others
breast cancer (13.0); others (15.5)
Extracranial metastases, absent vs present
absent (22.5); present (11.2)
Number of metastases, 1 vs > 1
1 met (15.5); >1 met (13.2)
Distant brain failure
Sex, male vs female
male (16.1); female (13.5)
Age (years), < 65 vs ≥ 65
< 65 (12.0); ≥ 65 (10.0)
KPS, ≤ 70 vs >70
≤ 70 (8.0); >70 (16.0)
Primary tumor, breast cancer vs others
breast cancer (10.0); others (14.0)
Extracranial metastases, absent vs present
absent (18.0); present (8.0)
Number of metastases, 1 vs > 1
1 met (16.0); > 1 met (10.0)
Neurologic function and toxicity
Median radiation doses to cavernous sinus, optic nerves and chiasm in patients treated with multi-fraction SRS (5 × 5 Gy)
Organ at risk
a dose > 25.0 Gy
a dose > 27.5 Gy
Palliative RT has been the standard treatment for skull base malignancies providing excellent relief of pain and improvement of cranial nerve dysfunction in up to 78% of patients [4–9]. More recently, SRS has been employed as a less invasive option for the treatment of skull base metastases with the aim to deliver a high dose to the target with dose sparing of critical structures such as the optic nerves and chiasm. The efficacy of single-fraction SRS for skull base metastases has been reported in few studies that include either nasopharyngeal carcinomas or skull base metastases [14–17]. Iwai et al.  treated 21 patients with cavernous sinus cancers, including 12 patients with metastases from systemic cancer. At a median follow-up of 13 months, the 1-year and 2-year tumor control rates were 68% and 47%, respectively, with no significant differences between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and metastases. After SRS, there was a resolution or improvement of preoperative cranial nerve deficits in 47% of patients. Kano et al.  reviewed retrospectively 37 patients with cancer involving the cavernous sinus treated with gamma knife SRS at the University of Pittsburgh between 1992 and 2006. At median follow-up of 9 months the progression-free survival rates after SRS were 77.6% and 26.6% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Lower marginal doses were associated with shorter progression-free survival, as in case of tumors in close proximity to the optic pathway or larger lesions; the progression-free survival rate was 89.7% for patients receiving a marginal dose ≥ 15 Gy as compared with 35.9% for those receiving < 15 Gy. Approximately one-third of patients had improvement in their neurologic deficits, similarly to that reported in other few series [14, 16].
Multi-fraction SRS represents an alternative to single-fraction SRS for relatively large brain metastases > 3 cm or adjacent to critical structures with a reported local control rates of 65-90% at 1 year [21–25]. In the current study we have evaluated 34 patients with a skull base metastasis compressing or in close proximity of the visual pathway who were treated with multi-fraction SRS (5 × 5 Gy). The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 63% and 32%, and respective actuarial 1-year and 2-year local control rates were 89% and 69%, which are in the best range of results observed after single-fraction SRS [14–17] and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy . A tumor local control of 66-76% at 1 year has been reported following multi-fraction SRS with 5 × 5–7 Gy in patients with brain metastases [21–25]. Ernst-Stecken et al.  reported the treatment results of a prospective study of multi-fraction SRS (5 x 6–7 Gy) in 51 patients with 72 brain metastases. At a median follow-up of 7 months the 1-year local control was 76% and survival 60%, respectively. Using a median prescribed dose of 25 Gy with a median of 5 fractions Kwon et al.  observed a similar actuarial local tumor control rates of 94% and 68.2% at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, in 36 patients with 66 brain metastases. While the optimal dose and fractionation for brain metastases remain to be determined, our results indicate that multi-fraction SRS with 5 × 5 Gy is an effective treatment for skull base metastases associated with good local control and improvement of cranial deficits similar to that reported after single-fraction SRS.
The main reason for using multi-fraction SRS is the advantage of fractionation with respect to radiobiology and normal brain protection. Single-fraction SRS for skull base lesions is in fact limited by the potential toxicity of high single doses to the cranial nerves. While the reported tolerance of cranial nerves in the cavernous after single-fraction SRS sinus is of 16–18 Gy , several retrospective studied have indicated that the incidence of radiation-induced optic neuropathy is about 2% for doses of 8–12 Gy, and becomes >10% for doses of 12–15 Gy [28–31]. Leavitt et al.  have recently reviewed 222 patients treated with Gamma Knife SRS for benign tumors adjacent to the anterior visual pathway. The risk of optic neuropathy was 0 for patients receiving a maximum dose of 8–12 Gy and 10% for those receiving >12 Gy, respectively, suggesting that small portions of anterior visual pathway in the range of 0.02-0.04 cm3 may receive doses up to 12 Gy. In our study no optic neuropathy were observed for doses >25 Gy to less than one-third of optic chiasm and > 27.5 Gy to a small volume of 0.01-0.06 cm3. These point doses may serve as baseline for future comparison when evaluating the risk of optic neuropathy after SRS using different schedules.
The present study has some limitations. The small number of patients and the relatively short follow-up do not allow for definitive conclusions about the risk of symptomatic optic neuropathy when using multi-fraction SRS. Further studies and larger number of patients are needed to confirm that patients receiving doses >25 Gy to the optic nerve and chiasm had a low risk of developing clinically symptomatic radiation optic neuropathy. Nevertheless, our results suggest that when single doses to the anterior optic pathway exceeds 10–12 Gy, as for large skull base metastases or for those adjacent to the optic apparatus, multi-fraction SRS may represent an alternative to single-fraction SRS with similar local control and lower risk of treatment-related complications.
The 1-year and 2-year distant failure rates were 50% and 77%, necessitating salvage treatment with SRS in ten and WBRT in seven patients, respectively. Overall, WBRT could be avoided in about 75% of patients. The main justification for omitting WBRT is that it is associated with a decline in quality of life and neurocognitive function [10–13] without conferring survival advantages [12, 13]. In a randomized study of 58 patients with 1 to 3 metastases who received WBRT plus SRS or SRS alone, Chang et al.  observed that patients treated with SRS plus WBRT showed a greater risk of a significant decline in learning and memory function at 4 months as compared with patients who received SRS alone. Sun et al.  reported similar neurocognitive impairment in patients with small cell lung carcinoma who received prophylactic WBRT. In our study the high distant failure rate was not apparently associated with increased death due to intracranial progression and neurological impairment, confirming that the omission of up-front WBRT is not detrimental for these patients. However, a close MRI follow-up is mandatory with the intent to treat early new distant brain metastases to avoid any potential neurocognitive deterioration.
In conclusion, multi-fraction SRS using 5 × 5 Gy is a feasible treatment option associated with good local control and improvement of cranial nerve symptoms in patients with a skull base metastasis involving the anterior visual pathway. A maximum dose less than 28.5 Gy delivered in 5 fractions to a small portion of the optic nerves and chiasm is associated with a very low risk of radiation-induced optic neuropathy.
We are grateful to Mr. Gianluca Marrone, Matteo Luciani, Emanuele Tosi, and Davide Mollo, radiologic technologists at department of radiation oncology, for their excellent technical assistance during the study.
- Laigle-Donadey F, Taillibert S, Martin-Duverneuil N, Hildebrand J, Delattre JY: Skull-base metastases. J Neurooncol 2005, 75: 63-69. 10.1007/s11060-004-8099-0View ArticlePubMed
- Patel SG, Singh B, Polluri A, Bridger PG, Cantu G, Cheesman AD, DeSa GM, Donald P, Fliss D, Gullane P, Janecka I, Kamata SE, Kowalski LP, Kraus DH, Levine PA, Dos Santos LR, Pradhan S, Schramm V, Snyderman C, Wei WI, Shah JP: Craniofacial surgery for malignant skull base tumors: report of an international collaborative study. Cancer 2003, 98: 1179-1187. 10.1002/cncr.11630View ArticlePubMed
- Preusser M, Berghoff AS, Schadendorf D, Lin NU, Stupp R: Brain metastasis: opportunity for drug development? Curr Opin Neurol 2012, 25: 786-794. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328359320dView ArticlePubMed
- Vikram B, Chu FC: Radiation therapy for metastases to the base of the skull. Radiology 1979, 130: 465-468.View ArticlePubMed
- Greenberg HS, Deck MD, Vikram B, Chu FC, Posner JB: Metastasis to the base of the skull: clinical findings in 43 patients. Neurology 1981, 31: 530-537. 10.1212/WNL.31.5.530View ArticlePubMed
- Svare A, Fosså SD, Heier MS: Cranial nerve dysfunction in metastatic cancer of the prostate. Br J Urol 1988, 61: 441-444. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1988.tb06594.xView ArticlePubMed
- Seymore CH, Peeples WJ: Cranial nerve involvement with carcinoma of prostate. Urology 1988, 31: 211-213. 10.1016/0090-4295(88)90141-0View ArticlePubMed
- Ransom DT, Dinapoli RP, Richardson RL: Cranial nerve lesions due to base of the skull metastases in prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1990, 65: 586-589. 10.1002/1097-0142(19900201)65:3<586::AID-CNCR2820650333>3.0.CO;2-PView ArticlePubMed
- Bumpous JM, Maves MD, Gomez SM, Levy BK, Johnson F: Cavernous sinus involvement in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 1993, 15: 62-66. 10.1002/hed.2880150114View ArticlePubMed
- Crossen JR, Garwood D, Glatstein E, Neuwelt EA: Neurobehavioral sequelae of cranial irradiation in adults: a review of radiation-induced encephalopathy. J Clin Oncol 1994, 12: 627-642.PubMed
- Sun A, Bae K, Gore EM, Movsas B, Wong SJ, Meyers CA, Bonner JA, SE S d, Gaspar LE, Bogart JA, Werner-Wasik M, Choy H: Phase III trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation compared with observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: neurocognitive and quality-of-life analysis. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29: 279-286. 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.6053PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Soffietti R, Kocher M, Abacioglu UM, Villa S, Fauchon F, Baumert BG, Fariselli L, Tzuk-Shina T, Kortmann RD, Carrie C, Ben Hassel M, Kouri M, Valeinis E, van den Berge D, Mueller RP, Tridello G, Collette L, Bottomley A: A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial of adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation in patients with one to three brain metastases from solid tumors after surgical resection or radiosurgery: quality-of-life results. J Clin Oncol 2013, 31: 65-72. 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0639View ArticlePubMed
- Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR, Allen PK, Lang FF, Kornguth DG, Arbuckle RB, Swint JM, Shiu AS, Maor MH, Meyers CA: Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009, 10: 1037-1044. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70263-3View ArticlePubMed
- Cmelak AJ, Cox RS, Adler JR, Fee WE Jr, Goffinet DR: Radiosurgery for skull base malignancies and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 37: 997-1003. 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00111-9View ArticlePubMed
- Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Yoshimura M: Gamma knife radiosurgery for cavernous sinus metastases and invasion. Surg Neurol 2005, 64: 406-410. 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.12.021View ArticlePubMed
- Mori Y, Kobayashi T, Shibamoto Y: Stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic tumors in the pituitary gland and the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 2006,105(Suppl):37-42.PubMed
- Kano H, Niranjan A, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD: The role of palliative radiosurgery when cancer invades the cavernous sinus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73: 709-715. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.005View ArticlePubMed
- Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L, Dinapoli R, Kline R, Loeffler J, Farnan N: Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90–05. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 47: 291-298. 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00507-6View ArticlePubMed
- Blonigen BJ, Steinmetz RD, Levin L, Lamba MA, Warnick RE, Breneman JC: Irradiated volume as a predictor of brain radionecrosis after linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 77: 996-1001. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.006View ArticlePubMed
- Minniti G, Clarke E, Lanzetta G, Osti MF, Trasimeni G, Bozzao A, Romano A, Enrici RM: Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis. Radiat Oncol 2011, 6: 48. 10.1186/1748-717X-6-48PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Lindvall P, Bergström P, Löfroth PO, Henriksson R, Bergenheim AT: Hypofractionated conformal stereotactic radiotherapy alone or in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with cerebral metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 61: 1460-1466. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.027View ArticlePubMed
- Ernst-Stecken A, Ganslandt O, Lambrecht U, Sauer R, Grabenbauer G: Phase II trial of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: results and toxicity. Radiother Oncol 2006, 81: 18-24. 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.08.024View ArticlePubMed
- Fahrig A, Ganslandt O, Lambrecht U, Grabenbauer G, Kleinert G, Sauer R, Hamm K: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases–results from three different dose concepts. Strahlenther Onkol 2007, 183: 625-630. 10.1007/s00066-007-1714-1View ArticlePubMed
- Narayana A, Chang J, Yenice K, Chan K, Lymberis S, Brennan C, Gutin PH: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with one or two brain metastases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2007, 85: 82-87. 10.1159/000097923View ArticlePubMed
- Kwon AK, Dibiase SJ, Wang B, Hughes SL, Milcarek B, Zhu Y: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases. Cancer 2009, 115: 890-898. 10.1002/cncr.24082View ArticlePubMed
- Minniti G, Scaringi C, Clarke E, Valeriani M, Osti M, Enrici RM: Frameless linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases: analysis of patient repositioning using a mask fixation system and clinical outcomes. Radiat Oncol 2011, 6: 158. 10.1186/1748-717X-6-158PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Mori Y, Hashizume C, Kobayashi T, Shibamoto Y, Kosaki K, Nagai A: Stereotactic radiotherapy using Novalis for skull base metastases developing with cranial nerve symptoms. J Neurooncol 2010, 98: 213-219. 10.1007/s11060-010-0179-8View ArticlePubMed
- Leber KA, Berglöff J, Pendl G: Dose–response tolerance of the visual pathways and cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 1998, 88: 43-50. 10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0043View ArticlePubMed
- Tishler RB, Loeffler JS, Lunsford LD, Duma C, Alexander E 3rd, Kooy HM, Flickinger JC: Tolerance of cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993, 27: 215-221.View ArticlePubMed
- Stafford SL, Pollock BE, Leavitt JA, Foote RL, Brown PD, Link MJ, Gorman DA, Schomberg PJ: A study on the radiation tolerance of the optic nerves and chiasm after stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003, 55: 1177-1181. 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04380-8View ArticlePubMed
- Leavitt JA, Stafford SL, Link MJ, Pollock BE: Long-term evaluation of radiation-induced optic neuropathy after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013, 87: 524-527. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2047View ArticlePubMed
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.