Open Access

Relationship between radiation pneumonitis and organizing pneumonia after radiotherapy for breast cancer

  • Yumi Oie1Email author,
  • Yasunori Saito2,
  • Masanao Kato2,
  • Fumitaka Ito1,
  • Hidekazu Hattori1,
  • Hiroshi Toyama1,
  • Hidetoshi Kobayashi1 and
  • Kazuhiro Katada1
Radiation Oncology20138:56

DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-56

Received: 24 October 2012

Accepted: 5 March 2013

Published: 8 March 2013

Abstract

Background

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) and organizing pneumonia (OP) are the two main types of lung damage that can occur after lung irradiation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between RP and OP after irradiation for breast cancer.

Methods

Four hundred and twenty-eight patients who underwent radiotherapy for breast cancer were identified. The whole breast was irradiated with two tangential photon beams. Chest computed tomography (CT) scan were performed when patients showed any symptoms that were suspicious for pneumonitis.

Results

Five patients (1.2%) were diagnosed with OP. All five patients showed ground glass opacities and consolidation of the border of the lesion of RP in the radiation fields. Infiltration of OP spread from the site of RP to the hilum of the ipsilateral lung. Between RP and OP, a free region space (FRS) could be detected.

Conclusions

OP is closely related to RP. All OP lesions developed near the site of RP.

Keywords

Organizing pneumonia (OP) Breast cancer Radiation pneumonitis (RP)

Background

Postoperative radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of breast cancer and can reduce the local and regional recurrence, thereby improving outcomes [1, 2]. One study reported that the overall frequency of Grade 2 or 3 adverse events after radiotherapy was 3.8% in Japanese women with breast cancer [3]. Adverse events following irradiation for breast cancer include pain and pigmentation of the chest wall, skin ulcerations, soft tissue fibrosis, rib fractures, myocardial infarction, pericardial effusion, and symptomatic or asymptomatic lung damage. Pneumonitis is one type of radiation-induced lung damage, and it can be divided into two types: radiation pneumonitis (RP) and organizing pneumonia (OP) [4]. OP is included RP in the broad sense, but OP in this paper is defined OP without RP.

RP is a form of acute or subacute lung damage related to the dose of radiation. It develops along the irradiated fields and results in pulmonary fibrosis. Asymptomatic RP is commonly observed, while symptomatic RP is rare. Past study reported majority (74%) of patients with RP were asymptomatic [5]. OP is a form of subacute lung damage that occurs independent of the radiation dose. It is identified inside and outside of the tangential irradiated field and does not result in pulmonary fibrosis. Although OP is rare, when it does occur, it is usually found in symptomatic. RP and OP are suspected to belong in another etiological category. The goal of the present study is to investigate the relationship between RP and OP.

Methods

Between January 2002 and December 2009, 428 patients with breast cancer underwent radiotherapy at Fujita Health University in Japan. Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery, total mastectomy, or no surgery were included. Patients with recurrent breast cancer and patients who were lost to follow-up within 1 year were excluded. One patient with bilateral breast cancer treated with radiotherapy at separate times was counted as two cases. Six patients with bilateral breast cancer who were treated with radiotherapy to both breasts simultaneously were counted as six patients and 12 breasts. Thus, the total number of patients treated with irradiation was 428, and the total number of irradiated breasts was 434.

Patients were asked to follow-up at the hospital after radiotherapy. When respiratory symptoms and/or general symptoms appeared, computed tomography (CT) was performed. The diagnosis of OP was based on the criteria proposed by Crestani et al. [4]: (1) radiation to the breast within 12 months, (2) general and/or respiratory symptoms lasting for 2 weeks; (3) radiographic lung infiltration outside the radiation port; and (4) no evidence of specific cause.

Characteristics of the 428 patients are shown Table 1. All patients were women. The median age was 56 years. Collagen vascular disease was found in four patients, including two patients with rheumatoid arthritis, one patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and one patient with polymyositis. Allergic disease was found in 20 patients, including 15 patients with asthma, and five patients with atopic dermatitis. Lung disease was found in two patients, including one patient with interstitial pneumonia and another patient with tuberculosis. The details of radiotherapy are shown in Table 2. Whole breast irradiation and chest wall irradiation with two tangential 4 MV photon beams was performed. For irradiation of the regional lymph nodes, an anterior photon beam was used. To boost irradiation to the tumor bed, an electron beam was used. The details of the adjuvant therapy are shown in Table 3. No patient was treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy.
Table 1

Patient characteristics (n = 428)

Age (y)

 

 20 ~ 29

3

 30 ~ 39

35

 40 ~ 49

104

 50 ~ 59

117

 60 ~ 69

124

 70 ~ 79

41

 80 ~ 89

4

Irradiated breast (right/left/bilateral)

211/208/9

Collagen vascular disease (yes/no)

4/424

Allergy disease (yes/no)

20/408

Lung disease (yes/no)

2/426

Diabetes (yes/no)

29/399

Smoking habit (yes/no/unknown)

30/371/27

Clinical stage (UICC)

 

 0

30

 I

215

 IIA

110

 IIB

47

 IIIA

11

 IIIB

17

 IIIC

3

 IV

1

Table 2

Radiation therapy details

Whole-breast irradiation / Chest wall irradiation

400/34

  50 Gy in 25 fractions

433

  54 Gy in 27 fractions

1

Irradiation to the regional lymph nodes (yes/no)

45/388

  supraclavicular region of affected side

 

    50 Gy in 25 fractions

26

    40 Gy in 20 fractions

5

  supraclavicular and parasternal region of affected side

 

    50 Gy in 25 fractions

4

    45 Gy in 23 fractions

1

    40 Gy in 20 fractions

8

  supraclavicular and parasternal region of bilateral side

 

    40 Gy in 20 fractions

1

Boost to tumor bed (yes/no)

31/403

    9 Gy in 3 fractions

30

    6 Gy in 3 fractions

1

Table 3

Adjuvant therapy details

Chemotherapy (yes/no)

181/247

  FEC-T

82

  AC-T

33

  FEC

20

  AC

9

  EC-T

8

  CMF

7

  TC

5

  Docetaxel

5

  Others

12

Concurrent endocrine therapy

 

  Tamoxifen or Tremifen (yes/no)

157/271

  Aromatase inhibitor(yes/no)

177/251

Trastuzumab(yes/no)

27/401

FEC-T = 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide plus taxane.

AC-T = adriamycin, cyclophosphamide plus taxane.

FEC = 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide.

AC = adriamycin, cyclophosphamide.

EC-T = epirubicin, cyclophosphamide plus taxane.

CMF = cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil.

TC = docetaxel, cyclophosphamide.

Results

Five (1.2%) of the 428 patients were diagnosed with OP (Table 4). All patients were diagnosed by clinical findings and imaging findings. Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) was performed for the diagnosis in three cases. OP was revealed in two patients. In one patient, only non-specific change was revealed by TBLB specimens. Infection was ruled out in all five patients. All five patients were nonsmokers, and none of these five patients had a history of allergic disease, collagen vascular disease, lung disease, or diabetes. Ages of these five patients were 52, 54, 55, 66, 68 years (median, 55 years old). Four of the five patients had right breast cancer, and one had bilateral breast cancer. Thus, there were six affected breasts in total. Clinical staging by the tumor-node-metastasis classification system showed that four breasts were T1N0M0 and that one breast was T2N0M0. All five patients had undergone breast-conserving surgery. For whole-breast irradiation, all breasts received 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The photon energy was 4 MV in all five patients. None of the five patients underwent irradiation to the regional lymph nodes (including the supraclavicular region, parasternal region or axillary region) or boost irradiation to the tumor bed. The percent of V20Gy compared with whole lung volume of each five patients was under 15%. Three (60%) of the five patients received chemotherapy before radiotherapy. Two (40%) of the five patients received concurrent endocrine therapy (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor, respectively). No patients received trastuzumab.
Table 4

Clinical characteristics of five patients with OP

Patient no.

Age (y)

Irradiated breast

Drug before RT

Drug concurrent with RT

Period before onset, after RT (days)

Initial area of pulmonary findings

Frequency of relapse

Relapse in contralateral area

Duration of steroid administration

1

66

Right

FEC

229

Right upper• middle• lower lobe

once

No

385

2

52

Right

FEC

Tamoxifen

218

Right middle lobe

once

No

206

3

68

Right

229

Right middle lobe

5 times

Yes

799

4

54

Right

Anastrozole

168

Right middle lobe

once

Yes

244

5

55

Bilateral

CMF

Exemestane

170

Bilateral middle lobe

No

38

median

55

   

218

   

244

Clinical course of patients with OP

The interval from completion of radiotherapy to occurrence of symptoms ranged from 170 to 229 days (median, 218 days). The initial clinical symptoms in the five patients were cough (four patients), fever (three patients), chest pain (two patients), and general malaise (one patient). In all five patients, the initial abnormal pulmonary findings were observed in the ipsilateral area, including the irradiated field. All patients were given steroids after being diagnosed with OP. The duration of steroid administration ranged from 38 days to 799 days (median, 244 days). Clinical and physiologic improvement and normalization of the pulmonary opacities occurred rapidly in all five patients after steroid administration, but relapse occurred in four patients during the steroid taper (two patients) or soon after steroid withdrawal (two patients). Five episodes of relapse occurred in one patient. One episode of relapse occurred in three patients. Migration of consolidation and of ground-glass opacities (GGO) was confirmed on CT examination in all five patients. Abnormal pulmonary findings appeared on the contralateral side in two of five patients at the relapse time.

CT findings

All five patients showed GGO and consolidation of RP in the radiation fields. Initial OP lesions were in close proximity to the RP lesions, but the lesions were not connected. Infiltration of OP spread from the site of RP to the hilum of the ipsilateral lung. Between both lesions, there was a free region space (FRS) (Figures 1, 2). FRS between the lesions of RP and OP were recognized in all five patients.
Figure 1

Fusion of CT images at the time of diagnosis of OP and treatment planning images (A = patient 1, B = patient 2, C = patient 3, D = patient 4, E = patient 5). There were free regions between the radiation lesions and the radiation-induced OP (arrow).

Figure 2

Close-up schema of the relationship between RP lesion and OP lesion.

Discussion

Radiation-induced lung injury can be divided into RP and OP [4]. RP is different from OP in several ways: (1) RP occurs during radiotherapy or shortly after the completion of radiotherapy, while OP occurs within 1 year after completion of radiotherapy; (2) RP lesions are characterized by alveolar opacities and are limited to the irradiated area, while OP lesions are characterized by lung infiltrates outside the radiation field and frequently migrate; (3) RP occurs in almost all patients whose lungs have been irradiation (i.e., not only in breast cancer patients), while the incidence of OP in patients with breast cancer or other malignancies is low; (4)RP always results in fibrosis and never relapses, while OP usually resolves without fibrosis but commonly relapses when the glucocorticoid is withdrawn. Further, OP lesions tend to migrate (i.e., the relapsed lesions often occur in another area, or even opposite side, relative to the initial lesions).

Imaging studies suggest that RP and OP may be related to one another. On CT scan, RP lesions occur close to the thoracic wall, and most OP lesions develop in close proximity to the RP lesions. RP occurs at site that have been irradiated with a dose > 20 Gy. Ogo et al. reported most OP lesions develop outside of the irradiated field and few cases (2 of 37) show no relation with RP [6]. OP shadows extend beyond the radiation port and often migrate to another side of the lung when OP relapsed. Although OP has been suggested to be an indirect effect of radiation, radiotherapy may play an important role in the development of OP [4]. OP is a form of lung toxicity that likely arises between some interaction between radiotherapy and the immune system [6], which may also explain the occurrence of OP lesions outside the irradiated field.

It is an important question why OP occurs after radiotherapy for breast cancer more frequently than after radiotherapy for other malignancies. Lungs are often irradiated for the treatment for malignancies. Late damage to the lung, which usually manifests as fibrosis, is a radiation dose-dependent occurrence in patients undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer, esophageal cancer and mediastinal tumors. The incidence of OP after radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer is 1.8-2.9% [611]. In contrast, RP occurs much more commonly after radiotherapy in patients with lung cancer [1214] or esophagus cancer [15, 16]. Several reports describe the occurrence of OP after radiotherapy in patients with lung cancer [1719].

The reasons why the incidence of OP is lower after radiotherapy for lung cancer, esophageal cancer, and mediastinal tumor than after radiotherapy for breast cancer remain unknown. One explanation could be related to the fact that the dose distribution of radiotherapy for breast cancers differs from that for other malignancies. Further, tangential irradiation is used to treat breast cancer but not other malignancies.

The relationship between the irradiated field and RP and OP is illustrated in Figure 2. The inner lines composed by the opposed tangential fields form a straight line, which indicates a sharp decline in absorbed dose. Tangential irradiation can reduce the volume of the irradiated lung when compared with other irradiation methods, such as opposing portal irradiation and single field irradiation.

%Dose-depth curves are shown relative to dose distributions in Figure 3a. The tolerance dose of RP is about 20 Gy; the more V20Gy increases, the higher the incidence of RP [12, 2022].
Figure 3

Fusion of CT images and %dose-depth curve. a. CT image at the radiation treatment planning and %dose-depth curve. % Dose decreased sharply at the tangential line. b. CT imaging at the diagnosis of OP and %dose-depth curve. The line (A) shows the border between RP and FRS. The intersection (arrow) of the line with the %depth-dose curve is associated with a radiation dose > 20 Gy. The RP lesion might appear closer to the chest wall because of lung volume reduction related to fibrotic change following RP. c. The 20 Gy point of the %dose-depth curve moved to the border of RP. The FRS corresponds with the region of steep change of distribution.

The border of the RP is closer to the thoracic wall than the point of 20 Gy on the planning CT (Figure 3b). This shift of the RP might actually be related to a decrease in lung volume because of fibrous changes after RP. The dose distribution should be shifted to coincide with the point of 20 Gy with the border of RP (Figure 3). This shifted dose distribution is suspected to be the actual dose distribution on the CT at the onset of OP.

RP and OP are closely related to one another. However, between the lesions of RP and OP, FRS was detected on the CT images. The same findings were seen in a previous report [6]. Fusion of CT images at the onset of OP and the planned dose distributions of radiotherapy is shown in Figure 3. FRS on the CT images was located at the region next to the rapidly decreasing dose area. The irradiated dose of FRS is suspected to occur at < 20 Gy, but not at zero. This dose area from 0 to 20Gy may allow an immunologic reaction that results in development of the initial OP point (or area).

The present study suggests that the OP lesions are closely connected to the FRS detected on the CT images, which arise next to the rapidly decreasing dose area. In conformal irradiation and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the dose contribution sometimes shows a steep dose gradient. Further pathology studies are needed to investigate this hypothesis.

Conclusions

OP occurred in 1.2% of patients with breast cancer who underwent radiotherapy. Most OP develops after irradiation for breast cancer. A low dose region and a steep dose gradient may be associated with the onset of the OP lesion. This finding suggests that frequent and active follow-up CT after radiotherapy may be needed.

Abbreviations

OP: 

Organizing pneumonia

RP: 

Radiation pneumonitis

TBLB: 

Transbronchial lung biopsy

GGO: 

Ground glass opacity

V20Gy: 

Lung volume covered with 20 Gy or more

FRS: 

Free region space

FI: 

Fusion image

IMRT: 

Intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine
(2)
Division of Radiology, Fujita Health University Hospita,1

References

  1. Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Davies C, Ewertz M, Godwin J: Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 2011, 378: 1707-1716.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans E, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S: Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005, 366: 2087-2106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nozaki M, Kagami Y, Mitsumori M, Hiraoka M: A multicenter investigation of late adverse events in Japanese women treated with breast-conserving surgery plus conventional fractionated whole-breast radiation therapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2012, 42: 522-527. 10.1093/jjco/hys050View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crestani B, Valeyre D, Roden S, Wallaert B, Dalphin JC, Cordier JF: Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome primed by radiation therapy to the breast. The Groupe d’Etudes et de Recherche sur les Maladies Orphelines Pulmonaires (GERM“O”P). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 158: 1929-1935.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jenkins P, Welsh A: Computed tomography appearance of early radiation injury to the lung: correlation with clinical and dosimetric factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011, 81: 97-103. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.017View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ogo E, Komaki R, Fujimoto K, Uchida M, Abe T, Nakamura K, Mitsumori M, Sekiguchi K, Kaneyasu Y, Hayabuchi N: A survey of radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome after breast-conserving therapy in Japan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008, 71: 123-131. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Takigawa N, Segawa Y, Saeki T, Kataoka M, Ida M, Kishino D, Fujiwara K, Ohsumi S, Eguchi K, Takashima S: Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome in breast-conserving therapy for early breast cancer: radiation-induced lung toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 48: 751-755. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00654-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Katayama N, Sato S, Katsui K, Takemoto M, Tsuda T, Yoshida A, Morito T, Nakagawa T, Mizuta A, Waki T: Analysis of factors associated with radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome after breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73: 1049-1054. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.050View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kubo A, Osaki K, Kawanaka T, Furutani S, Ikushima H, Nishitani H: Risk factors for radiation pneumonitis caused by whole breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery. J Med Invest: JMI 2009, 56: 99-110. 10.2152/jmi.56.99View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kano A, Ujita M, Kobayashi M, Sunakawa Y, Shirahama J, Harada T, Kanehira C, Fukuda K: Radiographic and CT features of radiation-induced organizing pneumonia syndrome after breast-conserving therapy. Jpn J Radiol 2012, 30: 128-136. 10.1007/s11604-011-0024-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ogo E, Komaki R, Abe T, Uchida M, Fujimoto K, Suzuki G, Tsuji C, Suefuji H, Etou H, Hattori C: The clinical characteristics and non-steroidal treatment for radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome after breast-conserving therapy. Radiother oncol: J European Society Therapeutic Radiology Oncol 2010, 97: 95-100. 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.02.032View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsujino K, Hirota S, Endo M, Obayashi K, Kotani Y, Satouchi M, Kado T, Takada Y: Predictive value of dose-volume histogram parameters for predicting radiation pneumonitis after concurrent chemoradiation for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003, 55: 110-115. 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03807-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Inoue A, Kunitoh H, Sekine I, Sumi M, Tokuuye K, Saijo N: Radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a retrospective study of risk factors and the long-term prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 49: 649-655. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00783-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yamashita H, Nakagawa K, Nakamura N, Koyanagi H, Tago M, Igaki H, Shiraishi K, Sasano N, Ohtomo K: Exceptionally high incidence of symptomatic grade 2–5 radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic radiation therapy for lung tumors. Radiat Oncol 2007, 2: 21. 10.1186/1748-717X-2-21View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Asakura H, Hashimoto T, Zenda S, Harada H, Hirakawa K, Mizumoto M, Furutani K, Hironaka S, Fuji H, Murayama S: Analysis of dose-volume histogram parameters for radiation pneumonitis after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Radiother oncology: J European Society Therapeutic Radiology Oncology 2010, 95: 240-244. 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.02.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin SH, Komaki R, Liao Z, Wei C, Myles B, Guo X, Palmer M, Mohan R, Swisher SG, Hofstetter WL: Proton beam therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012, 83: e345-351.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Iijima M, Sakahara H: Radiation pneumonitis resembling bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia after postoperative irradiation for lung cancer: a case report. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi Nippon acta radiologica 2003, 63: 332-333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamanishi T, Morimatu T, Oida K, Kori Y, Taguchi Y, Tanaka E, Inoue T, Kato T, Maniwa K, Kobashi Y, Noma S: Occurrence of BOOP outside radiation field after radiation therapy for small cell lung cancer. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = j Japanese Respiratory Society 2001, 39: 683-688.Google Scholar
  19. Murai T, Shibamoto Y, Nishiyama T, Baba F, Miyakawa A, Ayakawa S, Ogino H, Otsuka S, Iwata H: Organizing pneumonia after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of the lung. Radiat Oncol 2012, 7: 123. 10.1186/1748-717X-7-123View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Varga Z, Cserhati A, Kelemen G, Boda K, Thurzo L, Kahan Z: Role of systemic therapy in the development of lung sequelae after conformal radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011, 80: 1109-1116. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.044View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lind PA, Wennberg B, Gagliardi G, Fornander T: Pulmonary complications following different radiotherapy techniques for breast cancer, and the association to irradiated lung volume and dose. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001, 68: 199-210. 10.1023/A:1012292019599View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Blom Goldman U, Wennberg B, Svane G, Bylund H, Lind P: Reduction of radiation pneumonitis by V20-constraints in breast cancer. Radiat Oncol 2010, 5: 99. 10.1186/1748-717X-5-99View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Oie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement