Skip to main content
Download PDF

Wound healing after radiation therapy: Review of the literature

Radiation Oncology volume 7, Article number: 162 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Radiation therapy is an established modality in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients. Compromised wound healing in irradiated tissues is a common and challenging clinical problem. The pathophysiology and underlying cellular mechanisms including the complex interaction of cytokines and growth factors are still not understood completely. In this review, the current state of research regarding the pathomechanisms of compromised wound healing in irradiated tissues is presented. Current and possible future treatment strategies are critically reviewed.

Introduction

Radiation is employed as neoadjuvant, primary and adjuvant therapy for head and neck cancer. Complications after radiation therapy occur in up to 60 percent of surgical patients. Clinical sequelae include skin atrophy, soft tissue fibrosis, desquamation, epithelial ulceration, fistula formation and major vessel rupture[1, 2]. Impaired peri- and postoperative wound healing and the complications associated with it can be observed[3, 4] frequently and may require extensive reconstructive efforts[5–7] (Figure1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Clinical case of a 55-year-old male, six months after primary radiochemotherapy due to an advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx. Skin atrophy and soft tissue necrosis were observed 8 weeks after the completion of therapy.

Full size image

Physiological wound healing

Adequate wound healing involves interactions of cells. Cell biologic mechanisms relevant to the process include interaction of keratinocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells[8]. Epithelial closure of a wound is an important aspect of this complex biological process and relies primarily on the concerted action of activated keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts[9]. Three phases of wound healing with distinctive biochemical profiles have been described (Figure2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Schematic concept of wound healing. Adapted from Hunt TK [8].

Full size image

Hemostasis and inflammation (phase 1, day 0 to 4), are followed by proliferation (phase 2, day 3 to week 3) and maturation (phase 3, week 3 to 2 years)[10, 11]. These three phases are regulated by a complex network of interacting cytokines, growth factors and their cellular receptors.

Effects of radiation therapy on wound healing

Wound healing occurs in an ordered sequence of cellular interactions. Repetitive radiation injury disrupts this highly organized sequence of events, resulting in repetitive inflammatory responses and ongoing cellular regeneration[12].

There is an important distinction to be made between the early and the late side-effects of radiation therapy: Early side effects include erythema, dry desquamation, hyperpigmentation and hair loss[13]. Late effects include skin atrophy, dryness, telangiectasia, dyschromia, dyspigmentation, fibrosis, and ulcers[14].

The inflammatory and proliferative phases may be disrupted by the early effects of radiation. Affected factors during the inflammatory phase include transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN- γ) and proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 and interleukin-8[12]. These cytokines are overexpressed after the radiation injury leading to uncontrolled matrix accumulation and fibrosis[15].

The proliferative phase is characterized by granulation tissue formation, re-epitheliaziation and neovascularization. This phase is mainly regulated by TGFβ, VEGF, epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)[12]. Nitric oxide (NO) promotes wound healing by an induction of collagen deposition[16]. NO levels have been reduced in irradiated wounds of experimental animals[17]. This finding may explain the impaired strength of irradiated wounds.

During the remodeling phase, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and their tissue inhibitors are central to the process[18, 19]. MMP-1 is decreased after radiation therapy, which may contribute to inadequate soft tissue reconstitution[19] (Table1).

Table 1 Possible key factors affected by radiotherapy with respect to the phases of wound
Full size table

Keratinocytes represent a crucial cell type in the repair of late epithelial wounds and ulcers. Multiple molecular biological changes are observed in this cell after radiation when compared to radiation-naïve skin. In human radiogenic wounds, these cells show a shift in the expression from high molecular keratins 1 and 10 to the low molecular keratins 5 and 14. In non-healing ulcers, keratinocytes display a decreased expression of transforming growth factor-alpha and –beta(1), fibroblast growth factor 1 and 2, keratinocyte growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and hepatocyte growth factor. Expression of the matrix metalloproteinases 2, 12 and 13 has been shown to be elevated in irradiated human keratinocytes and fibroblasts[20].

Fibroblasts play the central role in wound healing through deposition and remodeling of collagen fibers. In irradiated tissue, fibroblasts have been shown to generate a disorganized deposition of collagen bundles. One likely mechanism resulting in disorganized collagen deposition is dysregulation of MMP and TIMP. These enzymes regulate extracellular matrix synthesis[21, 22]. As TGF-beta in turn regulates MMPs and TIMPs, this cytokine may be of particular relevance to radiogenic ulcers.

Current strategies in treating irradiated wounds

Established strategies in treating radiogenic ulcers with delayed and inadequate healing include standard wound care, vacuum-assisted devices, substitution of nutritional deficiencies, and measures to optimize blood and oxygen supply[6, 23].

Hyperbaric oxygen seems to optimize the partial pressure of tissue oxygen. It is frequently used for the treatment of osteoradionecrosis[24–27]. The postulated effects include an increased capillary density and more complete neovascularization[28–33]. Kendall et al. tested hyperbaric oxygen in a cell culture model and found that its application resulted in the downregulation of 9 genes involved in adhesion, angiogenesis, inflammation and oxidative stress[34]. Interleukin-8 mRNA levels were also suppressed after daily exposure of hyperbaric oxygen to endothelial cells in this study[34]. IL-8 is one key factor in the inflammatory phase of wound healing. This suggests that the benefit of hyperbaric oxygen may not be limited to osteoradionecrosis and further investigations regarding additional therapeutic effects may be valuable.

Currently, hyperbaric oxygen therapy is clinically used in chronic diabetic ulcers and wound healing complications after radiotherapy. Its efficacy has been proven by several randomized trials, but it is it is important to emphasize that for both diabetic wounds and radiation injuries, this therapy is used in conjunction with standard wound care management techniques[35]. A possible new approach for the hyperbaric oxygen therapy is the treatment of dermal wounds after flap surgery. Multiple case reports and animal studies have been written on this issue. Prospective clinical trials are necessary to support the application of hyperbaric oxygen to improve flap survival[36].

Future aspects in the treatment of irradiated wounds

Research into new therapeutic approaches to treat radiogenic ulcers includes: Special dressings, injection of (multipotent) cells, topical administration of active substances and the use of growth factors (Table2).

Table 2 Current experimental strategies in the treatment of irradiated wounds
Full size table

Special dressings

Different types of membranes and other covers of radiogenic skin injuries have been developed in the past.

Hydrogel membranes

Hydrogel membranes have a stable, flexible and transparent structure. Data of Lu et al. indicate that the hydrogel membranes act as a semiocclusive dressing and maintain a moist environment over the wound bed. Through this mechanism, re-epithelialization is thought to be enhanced because of the accumulation of cytokines and growth factors that support wound healing[37]. The use of hydrogels for partial thickness wounds after burns or laser resurfacing is supported by case reports[38]. Prospective, controlled data on their treatment effect in radiogenic wounds are not available.

Silver membranes

Bacterial cellulose impregnated membranes and poviargol, an antiseptic substance containing silver, was shown to accelerate the healing of irradiated wounds in an animal model[39]. A recent animal study has revealed that silver nanoparticles have the potential to promote wound healing through accelerated re-epithelialization and enhanced differentiation of fibroblasts. The exact effect of silver-coated membranes on skin repair is only partially understood. Hypothetic mechanisms include the fact that collagen bundle organization and the tensile properties of the skin[40] are found to be improved.

Skin allografts

A human deceased-donor skin allograft provides dermoprotection and promotion of re-epithelialization. It is utilized until autografting is possible or re-harvesting of donor sites becomes available[41]. This treatment is currently limited to burn injuries. It may be hypothesized that similar effects may be achieved in radiogenic ulcers, but clinical data and trials with sufficient numbers are not available.

Injection of cells

Wound healing is a complex mechanism that requires active cellular interactions. These interactions are only possible if a sufficient number of intact and healthy cells are present. Radiation leads to impaired cellular activity and cell death. Injection of cells has the potential of enhancing wound healing in irradiated tissues. Nevertheless, there is a significant risk of infection and possible tumor induction by injecting viable cells in vivo. All of the studies discussed below have to be seen in this context. All interventions are experimental and presently not applied in routine clinical practice.

Autologous fibroblasts

Autologous, unirradiated fibroblasts were shown in a rat model by Ferguson et al. to significantly improve healing of the irradiated surgical wound. This was evidenced by injections of culture medium, irradiated fibroblasts and non-irradiated fibroblasts in previously irradiated surgical wounds. The autologous non-irradiated fibroblasts caused greater increases of breaking load and ultimate tensile strength of the wounds than the irradiated control cells[42]. Other authors also report that implanting isolated dermal fibroblasts leads to a significant increase of wound strength in irradiated mice skin. This effect may rescue wounds from the otherwise irreversible effect of prior irradiation[43]. Both studies show promise for the treatment of irradiated wounds in patients. The injection of autologous fibroblasts would be possible at the end of a surgical procedure in irradiated patients. But this method has not yet led to the conduction of human clinical trials. One problem in this context is the risk of inducing neoplastic lesions by injecting viable cells.

Multipotent stem cells

Dermis-derived multipotent stem cells seem to be easily harvested from animal skin.

Chunmeng reports that both topical and systemic transplantation of dermis-derived multipotent cells accelerates healing after a radiation-induced injury[44]. The suggested mechanism is the synthesis of important wound healing factors such as VEGF, PDGF and TGF-beta by these cells. An interesting finding of this animal study on rats was also the analysis of the cell supernatants. A medium previously incubated with dermis-derived stem cells seems to contain relevant amounts of wound-healing promoting factors such as VEGF, PDGF and TGF-beta. This presents a valuable approach for further clinical studies.

Human mesenchymal stem cells have also been discussed in the therapy of radiogenic ulcers. Adipose-derived stem cells have been described for the therapy of limited local injuries and seem to improve angiogenesis and the reconstitution of dermal architecture[45].

Akita et al. describe the use of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) in a female suffering from a radiogenic wound 40 years after irradiation due to a uterine carcinoma. They used an artificial dermis impregnated with ADSC to cover the wound bed and injected ADSC into the margins. This method was combined with the local administration of a basic fibroblast growth factor to improve angiogenesis. The authors documented excellent results of wound healing and a durable regenerated tissue after 1.5 years[46]. The results of this study may be open to various interpretations. The observed effect may be due to the adipose-derived stem cells, the artificial dermis or the application of growth factors. Combined or additive effects cannot be excluded to explain the success of this approach. Clinical studies investigating the effect of adipose-derived stem cell injections into radiogenic wounds are not available. Hadad et al. developed a wound-healing model to study such effects in pigs[47]. They found no effect of the ASCs injections alone, but they could document improved wound healing by a combination therapy of ASC and platelet rich plasma injections into irradiated wounds. The most important effects were an accelerated wound closure and an increased microvessel density after the combined treatment.

A proangiogenetic effect of stem cell injections has been suggested by the authors, but other mechanisms may also serve to explain the findings in this study. New vessel formation and the optimizing of tissue microcirculation present a valuable effect of stem cell injections with respect to cutaneous wound healing. But the benefit on wound healing might end up providing a favorable environment for tumor recurrence after radiotherapy. High risk constellations or the application of stem cell injections in elderly people who have a diminished life time may put these patients at risk for developing tumor recurrence, which would justify further clinical trials. The clinical observations of Akita et al. are supported by another porcine study. Porcine skin seems to react similarly to human skin as far as radiogenic injuries are concerned. Also wound-healing mechanisms are similar in humans and pigs[48]. That is why porcine animal studies are of major value in this field of research. Forcheron et al. injected autologous adipose-derived stem cells into the skin of pigs irradiated with 50Gy[49]. This study focused on the cutaneous radiation syndrome. In this context the authors observed an improved clinical wound healing and an enhanced re-epitheliasation in animals injected with adipose-derived stem cells.

The antioxidant effects of adipose-derived stem cells[50] are reported by Kim et al. These effects seem to be mainly mediated through the activation of dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes via the paracrine mechanism.

Another advantage of adipose-derived stem cells over other stem cell sources is that they are easily obtained in large quantities by liposuction. Also their potency to synthesize growth factors and cytokines shows promise for the use in skin repair and regeneration[51, 52]. A cell culture study by Lee et al. supports the stimulatory effects of adipose-derived stem cells on cutaneous wound healing[53]. In their study, the proliferation of fibroblasts and their collagen synthesis were increased by a conditioned medium of adipose-derived stem cells in vitro.

The studies mentioned above reveal that adipose-derived stem cells seem to interact directly and via paracrine mechanisms with the key cells of wound healing. Clinical trials analyzing the role of these cells and their combination with other wound-healing promoting factors would contribute to a better understanding of the potential value of this treatment regimen.

Experimental application of active agents

The topical application of active agents to reduce the side effects of radiation therapy was analyzed in several cell culture and animal studies.

Bioflavonoids

Biologically active polyphenolic bioflavonoids have been shown in cell culture studies with keratinocytes to have positive effects on angiogenesis. The suggested mechanism is an increased expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor via the TNF (tumor necrosis factor)-alpha-pathway[54]. Angiogenesis plays a central role in wound healing. VEGF is believed to be the most prevalent, efficacious and long-term signal that is known to stimulate angiogenesis in wounds.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (phenylbutyrate, trichostatin A and valproic acid) were shown to suppress the cutaneous radiation syndrome in rat skin. Chung et al. analyzed different histone deacetylase inhibitors with respect to acute skin reaction and dermal fibrosis. They used vaseline as a negative control and performed immunohistological analyses. The underlying mechanism seems to be the suppression of the aberrant expression of radiation-induced transforming growth factor-beta 1 and 2 and tumor necrosis factor alpha[55].

This study presents the value of antitumor histone deacetylase inhibitors which may suppress cutaneous radiation syndrome and are possible new agents for increasing therapeutic gain in cancer radiotherapy.

Ascorbic acid

Ascorbic acid has been shown to result in the significant acceleration of healing of radiogenic ulcers. This was shown in a mouse model with doses of 10,16 and 20 Gy. A full thickness skin wound was created after radiation. Histological evaluations were performed at various times after wounding. Pretreatment with ascorbic acid augmented the synthesis of collagen significantly as revealed by an increase in hydroxyproline content. In the ascorbic acid group, an earlier wound closure was observed compared to the control group[56]. Optimizing collagen synthesis in a poorly healing wound by the application of ascorbic acid seems to be reasonable, but clinical trials are still lacking.

Copper tripeptide

Copper tripeptide accelerates the growth of normal and irradiated fibroblasts, which was shown in a cell culture study by Pollard et al.:

Primary human dermal fibroblasts were explanted from intraoperative specimens obtained from patients after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Normal unirradiated fibroblasts served as a control. Irradiated fibroblasts treated with copper tripeptide showed a similar proliferation rate as the untreated controls, and produced significantly more basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor than untreated controls. An early increase in growth factors and cell proliferation by irradiated fibroblasts treated with copper tripeptide may improve wound healing[57].

Thrombin receptor-activating peptide

Thrombin receptor-activating peptide (P517-30) has been shown to increase wound-breaking strength in irradiated tissues. This substance is a synthesized high-affinity thrombin receptor binding peptide. In a rat model, Cromack et al. revealed that P517-30 directly stimulates resident endothelial cells and fibroblasts to overcome dermal and circulating monocytic deficits. These results suggest a mechanism to accelerate wound healing with a potential clinical application and emphasize the activity of thrombin as a growth factor[58]. Special hydrogels could be possible applications for these growth factors[59].

Application of growth factors

Different growth factors have been analyzed for their potential role in wound healing, albeit their carcinogenic potential must be taken into consideration.

Important factors that may be suitable for this therapy include recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhM-CSF), basic fibroblast growth factor, TGF-beta and an inhibitor of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta(1) receptor kinase[60–65].

TGF-beta and TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotides

The exogenous application of TGF-beta (1) and (3) has the potential to act as a radioprotective agent, especially in adjuvant therapeutic regimens. In a rat model, reduced TGF-beta(3) expression was observed in the irradiated graft bed and induction of collagen synthesis was observed after application of TGF-beta (1)[66, 67].

Whether these findings are relevant in the clinical setting after radiation therapy remains to be seen, because TGF-beta suppression seems to have favorable effects as well:

TGF-β is a strong stimulator of extracellular matrix deposition. A new pharmacological approach was the development of the TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotide technology. This intervention shows promise as a therapeutic option for the inhibition of proteolytic tissue destruction, which is one key approach to optimize wound healing. Irradiated wounds often fail to heal because of high amounts of MMPs. TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotides seem to affect the major cell types of dermal wound healing: Fibroblasts, keratinocytes and endothelial cells were influenced in their gene expression of MMPs. MMP-1 and MMP-9 were significantly decreased after the treatment of fibroblasts and keratinocytes with TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotides in vitro[68]. Animal models of wound healing and scarring after eye surgery documented an anti-scarring effect of the TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotides in vivo[69].

TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotide technology shows promise. VEGF up-regulation was observed in vitro and a pro-angiogenetic effect of TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotides in radiation-induced dermal wounds was suggested[70]. Another study showed TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotides result in an increased expression of MMP protein and mRNA in tissue samples from radiation-induced chronic dermal wounds when compared to normal human skin. These effects were observed by immunohistochemistry and microarray analysis. Antisense TGF-beta oligonucleotide treatment also significantly down-regulates MMP secretion in vitro. Through these mechanisms, proteolytic tissue destruction may be inhibited in radiogenic ulcers[71]. Clinical trials would be helpful to better understand the effects of TGF-beta oligonucleotides in vivo. The interesting issue in this context is balancing the positive effects of matrix formation by TGF-beta and the negative side effects of a TGF-beta overexpression after radiotherapy.

Platelet-derived growth factor

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) may be useful as a topical agent in post-irradiation surgical incisions[47, 72]. PDFG is already in clinical use and shows favorable results. In previously irradiated tissue, rhPDGF (recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor) has been shown to enhance wound healing through the induction of granulation tissue formation. PDGF is a cytokine that is only activated in the presence of bone marrow-derived cells like wound macrophages. The transformation of wounds from a chronic to a short-term healing state after rhPDGF treatment was documented by serial histological examinations. The risk of tumor induction is difficult to quantify and must be considered prior to clinical application[73, 74].

Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor

Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been shown to modulate lipid peroxidation and glutathione content in skin wounds[75].

It has been demonstrated that GM-CSF increases the number of neutrophils, eosinophils and monocytes with corresponding bone marrow changes and might be suitable for different approaches in cancer therapy[76]. Irradiation decreases incisional healing and produces oxygen radicals that damage cells. Because of the lipid component in the membrane, the cellular membranes are particularly susceptible to radiation damage due to peroxidation. Glutathione acts as a co-substrate in the enzymatic repair of radiation damage. Suppressed levels of glutathione have been shown to increase after the administration of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor in irradiated rats. The reduction of complications associated with radiochemotherapy is one possible goal of GM-CSF application.

Recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF)

The use of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) was studied in mice after radiation with 45 Gy. Histological examinations showed that treatment with EGF accelerated normal wound healing when compared to no treatment. Collagen distribution was significantly increased in the group treated with EGF. Dermal and epidermal structure was also more stable in the treatment group[77].

Combined treatments

Pollard et al. investigated cytokine expression in a cell culture model of irradiated human skin isolates. Basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor were found to be less expressed in the radiation-induced dermal wounds[78]. These authors concluded that an early combined increase in basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor production in irradiated fibroblasts may improve wound healing[57]. Follow-up clinical studies have not yet been conducted.

There is some evidence to support the combination of different growth factors to escalate their therapeutic effect[79]. Important factors that may be suitable for combination therapy include recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhM-CSF), basic fibroblast growth factor and an inhibitor of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta(1) receptor kinase[60–65].

Sugiyama et al. studied combined treatment in rats after local irradiation with 30 Gy. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhM-CSF) and an inhibitor of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 receptor kinase, were injected into a full-thickness incisional wound site in the dorsal skin. Following combined treatment with the above three compounds the breaking strength of the irradiated skin increased to approximately one-half of that in the non-irradiated skin. Histological analysis of the wounded skin revealed an increase in the formation of collagen fibers. Moreover, the increased breaking strength was associated with an increase in a subpopulation of fibrocytes[60].

Conclusion

Radiotherapy is an integral modality of head and neck cancer therapy. Compromised wound healing is an important side effect of radiation therapy. The current body of literature comprises a large number of studies investigating the molecular, cellular and clinical effects of compromised wound healing as well as current and possible future therapeutic strategies. Many of the mechanisms leading to cell injuries are still not completely understood. A better understanding of tolerance doses, improved timing of the radiation regimen, and radiation sources would allow a more focused tumor treatment. These advances have led to an improved, but not yet complete protection of healthy tissues. The clinical challenge to optimize wound healing in irradiated patients remains. The present paper critically reviews and summarizes the literature concerning the biology and possibly therapeutic strategies of radiation-induced compromise in wound healing, including stem cell injections and application of growth factors.

References

  1. Marks JE, Freeman RB, Lee F, Ogura JH: Pharyngeal wall cancer: an analysis of treatment results complications and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1978, 4: 587-593. 10.1016/0360-3016(78)90179-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang Y, Shen Q, Wang Y, Lu K, Peng Y: A randomized prospective study of rehabilitation therapy in the treatment of radiation-induced dysphagia and trismus. Strahlenther Onkol 2011, 187: 39-44. 10.1007/s00066-010-2151-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Melan'in VD, Rybak RF, Senkevich VM: Prophylaxis of the postop complications in combined treatment of patients with laryngeal cancer. Vestn Otorinolaringol 1998, 46: 8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Girod DA, McCulloch TM, Tsue TT, Weymuller EA Jr: Risk factors for complications in clean-contaminated head and neck surgical procedures. Head Neck 1995, 17: 7-13. 10.1002/hed.2880170103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee S, Thiele C: Factors associated with free flap complications after head and neck reconstruction and the molecular basis of fibrotic tissue rearrangement in preirradiated soft tissue. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010, 68: 2169-2178. 10.1016/j.joms.2009.08.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hom DB, Adams G, Koreis M, Maisel R: Choosing the optimal wound dressing for irradiated soft tissue wounds. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999, 121: 591-598. 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70062-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lambert PM, Patel M, Gutman E, Campana HA: Dermal grafts to bony defects in irradiated and nonirradiated tissues. Arch Otolaryngol 1984, 110: 657-659. 10.1001/archotol.1984.00800360029006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt TK KD, Thakral KK: Cellular control of repair. In Soft and hard tissue repair: biological and clinical aspects. Edited by: Hunt TK Heppenstall RB, Pines E, Rovee D. Praeger, New York 1984:3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beaudry VG, Ihrie RA, Jacobs SB, et al.: Loss of the desmosomal component perp impairs wound healing in vivo. Dermatol Res Pract 2010, 2010: 759731.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scheithauer M, Riechelmann H: Review part I: basic mechanisms of cutaneous woundhealing. Laryngorhinootologie 2003, 82: 31-35. 10.1055/s-2003-36908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scheithauer M, Riechelmann H: Review part II: disorders in cutaneous woundhealing. Laryngorhinootologie 2003, 82: 36-39. 10.1055/s-2003-36909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dormand EL, Banwell PE, Goodacre TE: Radiotherapy and wound healing. Int Wound J 2005, 2: 112-127. 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00079.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Albers-Schonberg: Beitrag zur therapeutischen Verwendung der Roentgenstrahlen in der Behandlung des Lupus. Fortschritte a d Geb d Roentgen 1897, 1: 72-75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hom DHV, Lee C: Irradiatid Skin and Its Postsurgical Management. In Essential Tissue Healing of the Face and the Neck Edited by: Hom H, Gosain F. 2009, 224-238.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herskind C, Bamberg M, Rodemann HP: The role of cytokines in the development of normal-tissue reactions after radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 1998,174(Suppl 3):12-15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shi HP, Most D, Efron DT, Tantry U, Fischel MH, Barbul A: The role of iNOS in wound healing. Surgery 2001, 130: 225-229. 10.1067/msy.2001.115837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaffer M, Weimer W, Wider S, et al.: Differential expression of inflammatory mediators in radiation-impaired wound healing. J Surg Res 2002, 107: 93-100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Illsley MC, Peacock JH, McAnulty RJ, Yarnold JR: Increased collagen production in fibroblasts cultured from irradiated skin and effect of TGF beta(1)- clinical study. Br J Cancer 2000, 83: 650-654. 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1321

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gu Q, Wang D, Gao Y, et al.: Expression of MMP1 in surgical and radiation-impaired wound healing and its effects on the healing process. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2002, 21: 71-78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goessler UR, Bugert P, Kassner S, et al.: In vitro analysis of radiation-induced dermal wounds. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010, 142: 845-850. 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.01.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Medrado AP, Soares AP, Santos ET, Reis SR, Andrade ZA: Influence of laser photobiomodulation upon connective tissue remodeling during wound healing. J Photochem Photobiol B 2008, 92: 144-152. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.05.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson LB, Jorgensen LN, Adawi D, et al.: The effect of preoperative radiotherapy on systemic collagen deposition and postoperative infective complications in rectal cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2005, 48: 1573-1580. 10.1007/s10350-005-0066-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris A, Komray RR: Cost-effective management of pharyngocutaneous fistulas following laryngectomy. Ostomy Wound Manage 1993, 39: 36–7-40–2. 4

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobson AS, Buchbinder D, Hu K: Urken ML. Paradigm shifts in the management of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible, Oral Oncol; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Delanian S, Chatel C, Porcher R, Depondt J, Lefaix JL: Complete Restoration of Refractory Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis by Prolonged Treatment with a Pentoxifylline-Tocopherol-Clodronate Combination (PENTOCLO): A Phase II Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010,80(3):832-839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Freiberger JJ, Yoo DS, de Lisle Dear G, et al.: Multimodality surgical and hyperbaric management of mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 75: 717-724. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peleg M, Lopez EA: The treatment of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible: the case for hyperbaric oxygen and bone graft reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006, 64: 956-960. 10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tai YJ, Birely BC, Im MJ, Hoopes JE, Manson PN: The use of hyperbaric oxygen for preservation of free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1992, 28: 284-287. 10.1097/00000637-199203000-00016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mayer R, Hamilton-Farrell MR, van der Kleij AJ, et al.: Hyperbaric oxygen and radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2005, 181: 113-123. 10.1007/s00066-005-1277-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Narozny W, Sicko Z, Stankiewicz C, Przewozny T, Kot J, Kuczkowski J: An application of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in otolaryngological oncology. Otolaryngol Pol 2003, 57: 799-807.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Grundmann T, Jaehne M, Fritze G: The value of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) in treatment of problem wounds in the area of plastic-reconstructive head and neck surgery. Laryngorhinootologie 2000, 79: 304-310. 10.1055/s-2000-8802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Neovius EB, Lind MG, Lind FG: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for wound complications after surgery in the irradiated head and neck: a review of the literature and a report of 15 consecutive patients. Head Neck 1997, 19: 315-322. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199707)19:4<315::AID-HED10>3.0.CO;2-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathes SJ, Alexander J: Radiation injury. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1996, 5: 809-824.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kendall AC, Whatmore JL, Harries LW, Winyard PG, Smerdon GR: Eggleton P. Changes in inflammatory gene expression induced by hyperbaric oxygen treatment in human endothelial cells under chronic wound conditions, Exp Cell Res; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thom SR: Hyperbaric oxygen: its mechanisms and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011,127(Suppl 1):131S-141S.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Friedman HI, Fitzmaurice M, Lefaivre JF, Vecchiolla T, Clarke D: An evidence-based appraisal of the use of hyperbaric oxygen on flaps and grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006, 117: 175S-90S. discussion 91S-92S 10.1097/01.prs.0000222555.84962.86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu G, Ling K, Zhao P, et al.: A novel in situ-formed hydrogel wound dressing by the photocross-linking of a chitosan derivative. Wound Repair Regen 2010, 18: 70-79. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00557.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Brown CD, Zitelli JA: Choice of wound dressing and ointments. In Essential Tissue Healing of the Face and the Neck. Edited by: Hebda , Hom , Friedman , Gosain . BC Decker, Shelton, CT; 2009:409-433.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Legeza VI, Galenko-Yaroshevskii VP, Zinov'ev EV, et al.: Effects of new wound dressings on healing of thermal burns of the skin in acute radiation disease. Bull Exp Biol Med 2004, 138: 311-315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kwan Delta KH, Liu Delta X, Yeung KW, Ho CM, To MK, Wong KK: Modulation of collagen alignment by silver nanoparticles results in better mechanical properties in wound healing. Nanomedicine 2011,7(4):497-504. 10.1016/j.nano.2011.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Leon-Villapalos J, Eldardiri M, Dziewulski P: The use of human deceased donor skin allograft in burn care. Cell Tissue Bank 2010, 11: 99-104. 10.1007/s10561-009-9152-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ferguson PC, Boynton EL, Wunder JS, et al.: Intradermal injection of autologous dermal fibroblasts improves wound healing in irradiated skin. J Surg Res 1999, 85: 331-338. 10.1006/jsre.1999.5664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gorodetsky R, McBride WH, Withers HR, Miller GG: Effect of fibroblast implants on wound healing of irradiated skin: assay of wound strength and quantitative immunohistology of collagen. Radiat Res 1991, 125: 181-186. 10.2307/3577886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chunmeng S, Tianmin C, Yongping S, et al.: Effects of dermal multipotent cell transplantation on skin wound healing. J Surg Res 2004, 121: 13-9. 10.1016/j.jss.2004.04.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rigotti G, Marchi A, Galie M, et al.: Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: a healing process mediated by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007, 119: 1409-1422. discussion 23–4 10.1097/01.prs.0000256047.47909.71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Akita S, Akino K, Hirano A, Ohtsuru A, Yamashita S: Noncultured autologous adipose-derived stem cells therapy for chronic radiation injury. Stem Cells Int 2010, 2010: 532704.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hadad I, Johnstone BH, Brabham JG, et al.: Development of a porcine delayed wound-healing model and its use in testing a novel cell-based therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 78: 888-896. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hom DB, Unger GM, Pernell KJ, Manivel JC: Improving surgical wound healing with basic fibroblast growth factor after radiation. Laryngoscope 2005, 115: 412-422. 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157852.01402.12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Forcheron F, Agay D, Scherthan H, et al.: Autologous adipocyte derived stem cells favour healing in a minipig model of cutaneous radiation syndrome. PLoS One 2012, 7: e31694. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031694

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kim WS, Park BS, Sung JH: The wound-healing and antioxidant effects of adipose-derived stem cells. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2009, 9: 879-987. 10.1517/14712590903039684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim WS, Park BS, Park SH, Kim HK, Sung JH: Antiwrinkle effect of adipose-derived stem cell: activation of dermal fibroblast by secretory factors. J Dermatol Sci 2009, 53: 96-102. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.08.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kim JH, Jung M, Kim HS, Kim YM, Choi EH: Adipose-derived stem cells as a new therapeutic modality for ageing skin. Exp Dermatol 2011, 20: 383-387. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01221.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee SH, Jin SY, Song JS, Seo KK, Cho KH: Paracrine effects of adipose-derived stem cells on keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts. Ann Dermatol 2012, 24: 136-143. 10.5021/ad.2012.24.2.136

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Khanna S, Roy S, Bagchi D, Bagchi M, Sen CK: Upregulation of oxidant-induced VEGF expression in cultured keratinocytes by a grape seed proanthocyanidin extract. Free Radic Biol Med 2001, 31: 38-42. 10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00544-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chung YL, Wang AJ, Yao LF: Antitumor histone deacetylase inhibitors suppress cutaneous radiation syndrome: Implications for increasing therapeutic gain in cancer radiotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther 2004, 3: 317-325. 10.4161/cbt.3.3.698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jagetia GC, Rajanikant GK, Rao SK: Evaluation of the effect of ascorbic acid treatment on wound healing in mice exposed to different doses of fractionated gamma radiation. Radiat Res 2003, 159: 371-380. 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0371:EOTEOA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pollard JD, Quan S, Kang T, Koch RJ: Effects of copper tripeptide on the growth and expression of growth factors by normal and irradiated fibroblasts. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005, 7: 27-31. 10.1001/archfaci.7.1.27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cromack DT, Porras-Reyes BH, Wee SS, et al.: Acceleration of soft tissue repair by a thrombin-derived oligopeptide. J Surg Res 1992, 53: 117-122. 10.1016/0022-4804(92)90022-R

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bourke SL, Al-Khalili M, Briggs T, Michniak BB, Kohn J, Poole-Warren LA: A photo-crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel growth factor release vehicle for wound healing applications. AAPS PharmSci 2003, 5: E33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sugiyama K, Ishii G, Ochiai A, Esumi H: Improvement of the breaking strength of wound by combined treatment with recombinant human G-CSF, recombinant human M-CSF, and a TGF-beta1 receptor kinase inhibitor in rat skin. Cancer Sci 2008, 99: 1021-1028. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00761.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Masucci G: New clinical applications of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Med Oncol 1996, 13: 149-154.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Garnick MB, Stoudemire JB: Preclinical and clinical evaluation of recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhM-CSF). Int J Cell Cloning 1990,8(Suppl 1):356-371. discussion 71–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Vegesna V, McBride WH, Taylor JM, Withers HR: The effect of interleukin-1 beta or transforming growth factor-beta on radiation-impaired murine skin wound healing. J Surg Res 1995, 59: 699-704. 10.1006/jsre.1995.1226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Amento EP, Beck LS: TGF-beta and wound healing. Ciba Found Symp 1991, 157: 115-123. discussion 23–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lonergan DM, Mikulec AA, Hanasono MM, Kita M, Koch RJ: Growth factor profile of irradiated human dermal fibroblasts using a serum-free method. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 111: 1960-1968. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000055065.41599.75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Schultze-Mosgau S, Wehrhan F, Amann K, Radespiel-Troger M, Rodel F, Grabenbauer GG: In Vivo TGF-beta 3 expression during wound healing in irradiated tissue. An experimental study. Strahlenther Onkol 2003, 179: 410-416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Cromack DT, Porras-Reyes B, Purdy JA, Pierce GF, Mustoe TA: Acceleration of tissue repair by transforming growth factor beta 1: identification of in vivo mechanism of action with radiotherapy-induced specific healing deficits. Surgery 1993, 113: 36-42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Philipp K, Riedel F, Germann G, Hormann K, Sauerbier M: TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotides reduce mRNA expression of matrix metalloproteinases in cultured wound-healing-related cells. Int J Mol Med 2005, 15: 299-303.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Cordeiro MF, Mead A, Ali RR, et al.: Novel antisense oligonucleotides targeting TGF-beta inhibit in vivo scarring and improve surgical outcome. Gene Ther 2003, 10: 59-71. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Riedel K, Koellensperger E, Ryssel H, et al.: Abrogation of TGF-beta by antisense oligonucleotides modulates expression of VEGF and increases angiogenic potential in isolated fibroblasts from radiated skin. Int J Mol Med 2008, 22: 473-480.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Riedel K, Kremer T, Ryssel H, et al.: TGF-beta antisense oligonucleotides modulate expression of matrix metalloproteinases in isolated fibroblasts from radiated skin. In Vivo 2008, 22: 1-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mustoe TA, Purdy J, Gramates P, Deuel TF, Thomason A, Pierce GF: Reversal of impaired wound healing in irradiated rats by platelet-derived growth factor-BB. Am J Surg 1989, 158: 345-350. 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90131-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Hom DB, Linzie BM, Huang TC: The healing effects of autologous platelet gel on acute human skin wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007, 9: 174-183. 10.1001/archfaci.9.3.174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hom DB, Manivel JC: Promoting healing with recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor–BB in a previously irradiated problem wound. Laryngoscope 2003, 113: 1566-1571. 10.1097/00005537-200309000-00029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kilic D, Sayan H, Gonul B, Egehan I: The effect of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor on glutathione and lipid peroxidation in a rat model. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000, 26: 701-4. 10.1053/ejso.2000.0984

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Glaspy JA, Golde DW: Clinical applications of the myeloid growth factors. Semin Hematol 1989, 26: 14-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ryu SH, Kim YH, Lee SW, Hong JP: The preventive effect of recombinant human growth factor (rhEGF) on the recurrence of radiodermatitis. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 2010, 51: 511-517. 10.1269/jrr.10010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Riedel F, Philipp K, Sadick H, Goessler U, Hormann K, Verse T: Immunohistochemical analysis of radiation-induced non-healing dermal wounds of the head and neck. In Vivo 2005, 19: 343-350.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Avanzi GC, Gallicchio M, Saglio G: Hematopoietic growth factors in autologous transplantation. Biotherapy 1998, 10: 299-308. 10.1007/BF02678550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    Frank Haubner, Elisabeth Ohmann, Jürgen Strutz & Holger G Gassner

  2. Department of Radiotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    Fabian Pohl

Authors
  1. Frank Haubner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elisabeth Ohmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabian Pohl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jürgen Strutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Holger G Gassner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Haubner.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FH and HG had the idea for the literature review and drafted the manuscript. EO prepared figures and tables. FP supported the manuscript by his radio-oncological knowledge. JS and HG contributed through supervision and administrative support. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haubner, F., Ohmann, E., Pohl, F. et al. Wound healing after radiation therapy: Review of the literature. Radiat Oncol 7, 162 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-162

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-162

Keywords

Radiation Oncology

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us