Open Access

Kypho-IORT - a novel approach of intraoperative radiotherapy during kyphoplasty for vertebral metastases

  • Frederik Wenz1Email author,
  • Frank Schneider1,
  • Christian Neumaier1,
  • Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher1,
  • Tina Reis1,
  • René Schmidt2 and
  • Udo Obertacke2
Radiation Oncology20105:11

DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-11

Received: 3 December 2009

Accepted: 11 February 2010

Published: 11 February 2010

Abstract

Background

Instable and painful vertebral metastases in patients with progressive visceral metastases present a common therapeutic dilemma. We developed a novel approach to deliver intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during kyphoplasty and report the first treated case.

Methods/Results

60 year old patient with metastasizing breast cancer under chemotherapy presented with a newly diagnosed painful metastasis in the 12th thoracic vertebra. Under general anaesthesia, a bipedicular approach into the vertebra was chosen with insertion of specially designed metallic sleeves to guide the electron drift tube of the miniature X-ray generator (INTRABEAM, Carl Zeiss Surgical, Oberkochen, Germany). This was inserted with a novel sheet designed for this approach protecting the drift tube. A radiation dose of 8 Gy in 5 mm distance (50 kV X-rays) was delivered. The kyphoplasty balloons (KyphX, Kyphon Inc, Sunnyvale) were inflated after IORT and polymethylmethacrylate cement was injected. The whole procedure lasted less than 90 minutes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this novel, minimally invasive procedure can be performed in standard operating rooms and may become a valuable option for patients with vertebral metastases providing immediate stability and local control. A phase I/II study is under way to establish the optimal dose prescription.

Background

It is a common therapeutic dilemma in the treatment of advanced stage cancer that progressive visceral metastases and instable and painful bone metastases are present simultaneously and require urgent treatment. However, due to potentiated toxicity, simultaneous treatment with full dose chemotherapy and fractionated radiotherapy is rarely possible. In addition, instability of the vertebral column may require prolonged periods of bed rest. We have therefore developed a novel approach to deliver intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during kyphoplasty in order to regain immediate stability, sterilize the metastasis and continue with chemotherapy without a delay of several weeks. Here we report about the first use of this novel approach (Kypho-IORT).

Results

A 60 year old patient with metastasizing breast cancer to the lung and mediastinal lymph nodes under docetaxel chemotherapy (75 mg/sqm q21d for 3 cycles) presented with a newly diagnosed painful metastasis in the 12th thoracic vertebra. There was an increased risk for a pathologic fracture due to the extent of the vertebral metastasis (see figure 1). The initial diagnosis of a receptor-positive lobular-invasive breast cancer (pT2 pN1a G2 her2neu FISH negative) in the left upper-outer quadrant was made 3 years ago. The patient received initially breast conserving surgery, axillary dissection, adjuvant chemotherapy (6 × FEC) and whole breast radiotherapy with boost (50 + 16 Gy) followed by endocrine therapy using letrozole. Visceral metastases were diagnosed three months ago during routine follow-up and palliative chemotherapy was initiated.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-5-11/MediaObjects/13014_2009_Article_217_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Coronal CT scan of the vertebral metastasis.

The kyphoplasty itself was performed according to the standard procedure with some minor modifications. In short, under general anaesthesia and after sterile preparation of the patient, a bipedicular approach was chosen (see figure 2). Specially designed metallic sleeves (5 mm diameter, 6 cm length) were inserted (see figure 3) to guide the electron drift tube (3.2 mm diameter) of the miniature X-ray generator (INTRABEAM, Carl Zeiss Surgical, Oberkochen, Germany). After verification of the position of the guiding sleeves using biplanar X-ray, the INTRABEAM system was inserted with a novel sheet (diameter 4.2 mm) designed for this approach protecting the drift tube (see figure 4 + 5). Special care was taken to avoid sheer and bending stress on the drift tube and the sheet. A radiation dose of 8 Gy in 5 mm distance (50 kV X-rays, corresponding to 27 Gy at 2 mm distance from surface of the radiation source) was delivered during about 90 seconds to the center of the metastasis. Examples of dose distributions depending on the position of the radiation source can be seen in figures 6 + 7. Afterwards, the INTRABEAM system was removed. The kyphoplasty balloons (KyphX, Kyphon Inc, Sunnyvale) were inflated with 300 PSI on either side and 2 × 4 ml polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement were injected (KyphX, Kyphon Inc, Sunnyvale, see figure 8). The guiding sleeves were extracted and skin closure was done as usual. The whole procedure lasted less than 90 minutes. The patient was pain free on the day following the procedure and there was no visible radiation induced skin reaction.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-5-11/MediaObjects/13014_2009_Article_217_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Specially designed guiding sleeves were inserted using a bipendicular approach.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-5-11/MediaObjects/13014_2009_Article_217_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

X-ray control of guiding sleeve position.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-5-11/MediaObjects/13014_2009_Article_217_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

The INTRABEAM system is inserted into the guiding sleeves while the drift tube is protected by a novel sheet.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-5-11/MediaObjects/13014_2009_Article_217_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

The INTRABEAM system in treatment position.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-5-11/MediaObjects/13014_2009_Article_217_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Dose distribution for localization in the center of the vertebra. Please note that the spinal cord is touched by the 1 Gy isodose.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-5-11/MediaObjects/13014_2009_Article_217_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

The 8 Gy isodose reaches the spinal cord after placement of the radiation source in the dorsal part of the vertebra.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-5-11/MediaObjects/13014_2009_Article_217_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

PMMA cement is injected after inflation of the kyphoplasty balloons to stabilize the vertebra.

Discussion

Percutaneous kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are increasingly used [15]. It is a valuable treatment option for patients with painful and instable metastases to the vertebral column although its value for osteoporotic fractures has been recently questioned [6, 7]. Now it is possible to combine this procedure with the delivery of a high dose of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) providing immediate stability, pain relief and sterilization of the metastasis. Technically, vertebrae below the level of thoracic vertebra 3 are suitable for the Kypho-IORT approach when the metastasis is predominantly located in the vertebral body. A limited destruction of the dorsal corticalis is not a contraindication, however, special attention should be paid to avoid leakage of the PMMA into the spinal canal ("egg-shell technique"). Whether metastases in the pedicle can be approached with this technique remains to be determined based on the dose to the spinal cord and the stability of the positioning of the IORT device. External beam radiotherapy or radiosurgery [8, 9] even when combined with bisphosphonates do provide improved structural stability only after a prolonged period of time and the hazards of open radionuclides are avoided with this X-ray based approach [10]. A detailed discussion about different fractionation schedules for the treatment of spinal cord metastases can be found in a recent review [11]. This new application broadens the potential applications of the Intrabeam system, which is up to now mainly used for IORT for breast cancer [1214], and brain tumors [15]. Because long term experiences with this approach are not available at present, a phase I/II study is ongoing to establish the optimal dose presciption to provide local control.

Conclusion

IORT with low energy X-rays can be performed during kyphoplasty in standard operating rooms without the necessity of excessive radiation protection measures. As survival times of patients with many types of advanced cancer increase, the demand for this novel approach will potentially increase in the future.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University
(2)
Department for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University

References

  1. Hoffmann RT, Jakobs TF, Wallnöfer A, et al.: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV): indications, contraindications, and technique. Radiologe 2003,43(9):709-717. 10.1007/s00117-003-0947-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jang JS, Lee SH: Efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with radiotherapy in osteolytic metastatic spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine 2005,2(3):243-248. 10.3171/spi.2005.2.3.0243View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ofluoglu O: Minimally invasive management of spinal metastases. Orthop Clin North Am 2009,40(1):155-168. 10.1016/j.ocl.2008.09.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sciubba DM, Nguyen T, Gokaslan ZL: Solitary vertebral metastsis. Orthop Clin North Am 2009,40(1):145-154. 10.1016/j.ocl.2008.09.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wong J, Chow E, de Sa E, et al.: Immediate pain relief and improved structural stability after percutaneous vertebroplasty for a severely destructive vertebral compression fracture. J Palliat Med 2009,12(1):97-100. 10.1089/jpm.2009.9687View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, et al.: A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 2009, 361: 557-568. 10.1056/NEJMoa0900429View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, et al.: A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 2009, 361: 569-579. 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerszten PC, Welch WC: Cyberknife radiosurgery for metastatic spine tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2004,15(4):491-501. 10.1016/j.nec.2004.04.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rades D, Veninga T, Stalpers LJ, et al.: Outcome after radiotherapy alone for metastatic spinal cors comporession in patients with oligometastases. J Clin Oncol 2007,25(1):50-56. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.7155View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardoso ER, Ashamalla H, Weng L, et al.: Percutaneous tumor curretage and interstitial delivery of samarium-153 coupled with kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral metastases. J Neurosurg Spine 2009,10(4):336-342. 10.3171/2008.11.SPINE0856View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Souchon R, Wenz F, Sedlmayer F, et al.: DEGRO practice guidelines for palliative radiotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: bone metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Strahlenther Onkol 2009,185(7):417-424. 10.1007/s00066-009-2044-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vaidya JS, Baum M, D'Souza DP, et al.: Targeted intra-operative radiotherapy (Targit): an innovative method of treatment for early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2001,12(8):1075-1080. 10.1023/A:1011609401132View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vaidya JS, Hall-Craggs M, Baum M, et al.: Percutaneous minimally invasive stereotactic primary radiotherapy for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2002,3(4):252-253. 10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00717-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Steil V, Bauer L, Melchert F, Wenz F: A novel device for intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). Onkologie 2003, 26: 596-598. 10.1159/000074158View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cosgrove GR, Hochberg FH, Zervas NT, et al.: Interstitial irradiation of brain tumors, using a miniature radiosurgery device: initial experience. Neurosurgery 1997,40(3):518-523. 10.1097/00006123-199703000-00018PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wenz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement