[68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET/CT for meningioma IMRT treatment planning
© Gehler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 19 June 2009
Accepted: 18 November 2009
Published: 18 November 2009
The observation that human meningioma cells strongly express somatostatin receptor (SSTR 2) was the rationale to analyze retrospectively in how far DOTATOC PET/CT is helpful to improve target volume delineation for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Patients and Methods
In 26 consecutive patients with preferentially skull base meningioma, diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and planning-computed tomography (CT) was complemented with data from [68Ga]-DOTA-D Phe1-Tyr3-Octreotide (DOTATOC)-PET/CT. Image fusion of PET/CT, diagnostic computed tomography, MRI and radiotherapy planning CT as well as target volume delineation was performed with OTP-Masterplan®. Initial gross tumor volume (GTV) definition was based on MRI data only and was secondarily complemented with DOTATOC-PET information. Irradiation was performed as EUD based IMRT, using the Hyperion Software package.
The integration of the DOTATOC data led to additional information concerning tumor extension in 17 of 26 patients (65%). There were major changes of the clinical target volume (CTV) which modify the PTV in 14 patients, minor changes were realized in 3 patients. Overall the GTV-MRI/CT was larger than the GTV-PET in 10 patients (38%), smaller in 13 patients (50%) and almost the same in 3 patients (12%). Most of the adaptations were performed in close vicinity to bony skull base structures or after complex surgery. Median GTV based on MRI was 18.1 cc, based on PET 25.3 cc and subsequently the CTV was 37.4 cc. Radiation planning and treatment of the DOTATOC-adapted volumes was feasible.
DOTATOC-PET/CT information may strongly complement patho-anatomical data from MRI and CT in cases with complex meningioma and is thus helpful for improved target volume delineation especially for skull base manifestations and recurrent disease after surgery.
Meningiomas represent about 20% of all intracranial brain tumors and are therefore the most frequent nonglial brain tumors in adults with a clear predomination in women (f/m 2:1) . More than 90% are histological benign of mesodermal origin arising from the arachnoid meninges of the brain and are slow-growing with a low proliferation index. Atypical or malignant histology is rare and often requires multimodal treatment caused by increased local relapse.
Particularly meningiomas of the skull base are difficult to treat due to their close relation to critical structures like brainstem, major vessels and cranial nerves.
Although surgical resection of meningioma is the preferred treatment approach, ionizing radiation is a highly effective treatment modality. After complete surgical resection long-term recurrence-free survival can be achieved up to 93 and 80% after 5 and 10 years, respectively. Without total removal the recurrence-free survival is inferior, up to 65 and 45% or worse after 5 and 10 years, respectively [1–4]. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) can improve local tumor control and overall survival after incomplete surgical resection [5–8]. Similar to resection, radiotherapy alone offers 5-year local control above 90% [9, 10]. However, the surrounding tissue and the benign histology mandate extreme precision during treatment planning in order to minimize the risk of side effects. Therefore stereotactic fractionated treatment protocols comprise the standard radiotherapy approach. Similar to numerous different malignancies treated with intensity-modulated RT [11–13], recently several IMRT based protocols for meningiomas have been issued offering even higher target volume conformity and improved normal tissue protection [14–19]. With increasing conformity the need for accurate target volume delineation is of outmost importance. Of special importance is the fact that target volume definition after single or repeated surgical intervention is frequently hampered by artifacts. In general the use of highly conformal treatment techniques mandates improved pretherapeutic imaging. In this regard, positron emission tomography (PET) based techniques as well as other functional imaging modalities including SPECT-CT or also MRI enter the routine in radiation oncology [20–26].
Up to now treatment planning was mainly based on combinations of contrast enhanced CT and MRI. Especially after repetitive surgery and in case of an infiltrative growth pattern these imaging modalities have their limitations.
Meningioma cells strongly express somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR 2) which offers an additional positron emission tomography (PET) based imaging for tumor delineation with the somatostatin-receptor ligand [68Ga]-DOTA-D Phe1-Tyr3-Octreotide (DOTATOC) . DOTATOC-PET/CT shows a high meningioma to background ratio which can be used to improve target volume definition prior to IMRT [28, 29].
To document the value of [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET/CT for treatment planning of complex meningiomas preferentially of the skull base we retrospectively analyzed a series of patients in whom CT/MRI based treatment planning was complemented by [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET/CT.
Patients and Methods
Patients treated with IMRT
n = 26
Karnofsky Performance Scale (median/range) [%]
Age (median/range) [years]
Optic nerve sheath
resection for 1/2/3 times
WHO II (atypical meningioma)
Unknown (diagnosis based on MRI, CT)
Postoperative period until initiation of radiation (median/range) [months]
Imaging was performed using a dedicated PET/CT scanner (Biograph 16 HiRez; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany).
Forty minutes after intravenous injection of 150 MBq [68Ga]-DOTATOC the combined examination commenced with a topogram to define the PET/CT examination range (2 fields of view (FOV)). Non-contrast CT scans were performed firstly for attenuation correction of PET data and for anatomic correlation. Subsequently the PET scan was done acquiring static emission data for 4 minutes per FOV.
PET images were reconstructed by using an iterative algorithm (ordered-subset expectation maximization: 4 iterations, 8 subsets). Non-enhanced CT data were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 5 mm (axial) and an increment of 5 mm.
The reconstructed PET, CT and fused images were displayed on the manufacturer's workstation (e-soft, Siemens Medical Solutions) in axial, coronal and sagittal planes with a resolution of 128 × 128 pixels for the PET and 512 × 512 pixels for the CT images.
The fused PET/CT images were evaluated by two experienced nuclear medicine experts and two experienced radiologists in consensus. For all detected meningiomas the standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated using the region of interest (ROI, 50% isocontour) method and was corrected for weight.
Treatment planning and target volume definition
IMRT treatment planning was primarily based on diagnostic MRI data and was secondarily complemented by the information from [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET. Additionally all patients routinely had a neuroophthalmological and endocrinological examination and an audiometry. RT planning was performed on a 3D-data set generated from 3 mm CT scans in treatment position. For immobilization of the head an individual thermoplastic head mask fixation was used. Image fusion of diagnostic MRI, RT planning CT and PET/CT as well as target volume delineation was done with OTP-Masterplan® package (Theranostic GmbH, Solingen, D). The CT planning images in mask fixation were fused with the CT images derived from PET/CT (CT to CT, additionally CT to diagnostic MRI) using the automatic matching algorithm stored in the OTP-Masterplan® system. As being initially linked to the combined PET/CT images the raw PET data did not require a separate image fusion.
For gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation the initial macroscopic tumor volume definition was based on MRI findings and RT planning CT information only (GTV-MRI/CT). Subsequently the PET positive tumor lesions were defined by the same therapist (GTV-PET). The GTV-MRI/CT as well as the GTV-PET was counterchecked by an advanced neuroradiologist or rather nuclear medicine physician. MRI data were complemented by DOTATOC-PET findings and additional clinical information (particularly including potential areas of microscopic tumor growth) with a resulting CTV. Finally the CTV was expanded with an overall safety margin of 4 mm to the PTV.
For IMRT treatment planning organs at risk (brainstem, optical nerves, chiasm, lens, internal ear and hippocampus) were outlined. Irradiation was performed as EUD (equivalent uniform dose)-based IMRT, using the Hyperion® software package. Three-dimensional dose distributions were calculated and optimized via Monte Carlo dose calculation using a multileaf collimator (leaf width: 4 mm at isocenter). The purpose of treatment planning was to cover the 95% isoline by the PTV. The dose prescription was 54 Gy in total with a daily fraction dose of 1.8 Gy, 5 times a week. Patient positioning was verified by cone beam CT imaging every day in the first week of irradiation and afterwards twice a week.
Quantitative analysis of tumor volumes
For quantification of target volume changes based on the PET findings we evaluated both the tumor volumes (GTV-MRI/CT and GTV-PET) and intersection areas between the GTV-MRI/CT and GTV-PET (Intersection-GTV-MRI/CT/PET). For both modalities we computed the increase in [cc] with respect to the intersection area (Increase-MRI/CT vs. Intersection, respectively Increase-PET vs. Intersection). These areas are those, which are visible in one target volume only. Finally the ratios between the increased volumes with respect to the GTV-MRI/CT were assessed. In order to report these volume values for the whole patient collective pure descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, maximum, minimum) were used.
A median treatment dose of 53 Gy (range 51.2-57 Gy) could be achieved. IMRT was submitted with a 6/15 MV linear accelerator (Elekta Synergy SBM XVI) and was carried out on average with 8 beams (range 6-10) and 41 segments (range 17-70).
Target volume definition by MRI/CT
The GTV-MRI/CT included the macroscopic tumor visible in the planning CT and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. All meningiomas could be delineated on MRI and CT. For the GTV-MRI/CT no safety margin was defined. Median GTV-MRI/CT was 18.1 cc (mean: 27.5; range 1.2-79.5 cc).
Target volume definition by [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET
All 26 patients displayed a pronounced SSTR 2 tracer retention within the meningioma. In addition to a strong signal in three patients there were distant small spots without a morphologic correlate in the cranial MRI, which were not included in the GTV-PET.
There were several DOTATOC-PET positive lesions beyond the cranium without any further suspicious tumor detection in an additional CT or MRI examination.
Target volume definition based on [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET (GTV-PET) included the tumor volume with an intense tracer uptake, all 26 meningiomas showed a high tumor-to-background contrast. For the target volume definition the windowing of the DOTATOC-PET was determined by the optimal matching between the PET-positive areas and the viewable tumor margins determined by CT/MRI. The physiological signal of the bony skull and the air-filled nasal cavity was masked out via windowing; neither a SUV cut-off nor a safety margin was defined. In general, the differentiation between the pituitary gland and adjacent located tumor manifestations is mostly sophisticated caused by the SSTR 2 expression of the gland itself. In cases with PET positive tumor manifestations nearby the pituitary gland, they were included completely if it was not possible to distinguish gland from tumor manifestation. The median GTV-PET was 25.3 cc (mean: 33.5 cc; range 0.6-106.1 cc).
Correlation of GTV-PET and GTV-MRI/CT - Multimodal target volume definition
In 14 cases there were major changes of the clinical target volume (CTV) based on PET findings (10 enlargements, two reductions and in two cases areas of target volume enlargement as well as reduction). Minor changes (only changes at the borders of the target volume without affection of a new anatomical area) were seen in three patients (three enlargements). Three cases showed a pronounced enlargement of the CTV in the postoperative situation based on enclosure of the PET positive resection hole. Exemplarily, in one patient the conventional MRI imaging showed no residual tumor growth after resection of an olfactory's meningioma, whereas the additional PET data revealed active tumor mass in the nasal cavity and in the ethmoidal sinus. Therefore a clear enlargement of the CTV (GTV-MRI/CT 13.6 cc; GTV-PET 18.2 cc; CTV 19.6 cc) resulted. In one case there was a remarkable enlargement of the CTV caused by a PET positive osseous lesion which could not clearly be seen on MRI and CT imaging (GTV-MRI/CT 69.3 cc; GTV-PET 94 cc; CTV 99 cc). In 9 of 26 patients DOTATOC-PET delivered no supplementary information regarding tumor extension known from MRI and CT. The median CTV as a summation of the GTV-MRI/CT and the GTV-PET without a safety margin was 37.4 cc (mean 42.2 cc; range 1.3-143.2 cc). With the exception of three patients in the group of patients with additional information from the DOTATOC-PET the CTV was always larger than each single of the correlating GTV (PET and MRI/CT). The PTV was created from the CTV with an overall safety margin of 4 mm. Median PTV was 78.3 cc (mean: 92.3 cc; range 6.8-227.7 cc).
Treatment characteristics, target volumes
Increase-MRI/CT vs Intersection [cc]
Increase-PET vs Intersection [cc]
Ratio Increase-MRI/CT to GTV-MRI/CT
Ratio Increase-PET to GTV-MRI/CT
A wide range of publications has documented the value of external beam radiation for the treatment of meningioma. However clinical practice is more likely to show that only those cases suffering from complex meningioma are referred to radiotherapy. This included patients with relapse after surgery, large tumors or complexly growing tumor. Thus the treating physician is frequently faced with the dilemma to spare as much of critical normal tissue without missing gross tumor. The use of highly conformal treatments including IMRT even increases the need for optimal target volume delineation.
In the present study we evaluated the value of the [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET for treatment planning of intracranial complexly shaped meningiomas. Up to now the follow up time in our cohort is all too short to give some information about local control after IMRT treatment. However, our data show clearly that the use of [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET improved target volume delineation in a larger proportion of our patients schedule for an IMRT based radiation approach when compared to MRI based planning alone. Particularly bony lesions or direct bone infiltration by adjacent meningioma tissue were more likely to be detected with PET. Basically we found a geographical miss in 50% of the patients and - on the other hand - were able to reduce the CTV in 38% of the patients. When compared to other observations using [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET, 11C-Methionine [30, 31] or 18F-Tyrosine , similar ranges were reported in the term of PET scanning offering additional information. In this regard Milker-Zabel reported relevant information in 19 out of 26 patients using DOTATOC , Astner reported additional information in 29 out of 32 patients  and Rutten reported changes in 6 out of 13 lesions in 11 patients using 18F-Tyrosine . In our series in 17 out of 26 patients PET scanning offered relevant complementary information.
When one analyzes the pattern of changes in more detail, Milker-Zabel and Rutten reported larger proportions of potential geographical misses avoided by PET scanning (38% in both studies) [32, 33]. This is in accordance with our findings where the CTV was increased after inclusion of the PET data (50%). In contrast, the study by Astner reported a larger proportion of GTV/PTV reductions after inclusion of 11C-Methionine-PET data when compared to MRI scanning alone (75%) .
The reasons for these differences are not readily deducible from the reported data. However, it may be speculated that the inherent bias of patient selection and strategies employed for MRI-GTV definition may be the underlying reason. This assumption is supported by the fact that at least comparable volumes were treated in all three studies excluding the possibility that differences in tumor volume are responsible for the differences in target volume changes.
An important consideration in this context is the open question if there is s SUV-threshold to define the GTV-PET. In our study for the target volume definition the windowing of the DOTATOC-PET was determined by the matching between the PET-positive areas and the viewable tumor margins determined by CT/MRI. The physiological signal of the bony skull and the air-filled nasal cavity was masked out via windowing. Although a SUV-threshold would be helpful for the GTV-DOTATOC-PET delineation in meningiomas, up to know clear evidence for a SUV cut-off is missing. Astner et al.  reported an interesting phantom study in 11 patients with glomus tumors and revealed that a value of 32% of the maximum standardized uptake was an appropriate threshold for tumor delineation. At the moment we do not have this information for meningiomas in DOTATOC-PET imaging. However, in regard to IMRT planning for meningiomas special biological characteristics of microscopic tumor growth have to be taken into account especially for CTV delineation. Hence in our opinion we have to be cautious in reducing target volumes along an experimental SUV-threshold alone.
From the data currently available it seems that either [68Ga]-DOTATOC, 11C-Methionine or 18F-Tyrosine are useful tracers for target volume definition in patients with meningioma. Up to now there is no clear evidence available supporting the superiority of any of the given tracers.
As stated above, meningiomas particularly show high levels of somatostatin receptor expression (SSTR2) resulting in a high tracer uptake. The usefulness of [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET for a distinction of meningioma from other brain tumors has been well documented [35–37]. In several disorders including metastasis or glioma Methionine or Tyrosine may produce false positive results. However, amino acid tracers like Methionine or Tyrosine are markers of amino acid transport and give some more information in regard to metabolic activity of several tumor tissues. At least Methionine-PET may help to judge the aggressiveness of meningioma since the uptake has been reported to correlate with the proliferative activity measured by the KI-67 index [38–40]. In our opinion for IMRT planning it seems reasonable to use the tracer with the highest inherent specificity which - by means of its mechanism of action - is [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET.
A given disadvantage of DOTATOC is the fact that the pituitary gland is generally highly positive and limits the precision of target volume definition in this area.
Although PET/CT images have reached a considerable level of spatial discrimination the current technology does not allow for the visualization of microscopic tumor growth along the dural membranes. Thus it will be still necessary to add empirical margins to cover all areas.
[68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET/CT information strongly complements image data from MRI and CT in cases with complex meningiomas of the skull base. In all meningioma patients a tracer uptake of the [68Ga]-DOTATOC was seen. Especially in patients with complex skull base meningioma or recurrent disease [68Ga]-DOTATOC offers important additional information. Therefore we would recommend the use of the [68Ga]-DOTATOC for GTV definition in all cases with complex meningioma.
Further evaluation with a larger number of patients seems to be justified and long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the clinical impact.
clinical target volume
equivalent uniform dose
field of view
gross tumor volume
intensity modulated radiotherapy
magnetic resonance imaging
positron emission tomography
planning target volume
region of interest
single photon emission computed tomography
standardized uptake value.
- Mirimanoff RO, Dosoretz DE, Linggood RM, Ojemann RG, Martuza RL: Meningioma: analysis of recurrence and progression following neurosurgical resection. J Neurosurg 1985,62(1):18-24. 10.3171/jns.1985.62.1.0018View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCutcheon IE: The biology of meningiomas. J Neurooncol 1996,29(3):207-216. 10.1007/BF00165650View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stafford SL, Perry A, Suman VJ, Meyer FB, Scheithauer BW, Lohse CM, Shaw EG: Primarily resected meningiomas: outcome and prognostic factors in 581 Mayo Clinic patients, 1978 through 1988. Mayo Clin Proc 1998,73(10):936-942. 10.4065/73.10.936View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mathiesen T, Lindquist C, Kihlstrom L, Karlsson B: Recurrence of cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1996,39(1):2-7. discussion8–9 10.1097/00006123-199607000-00002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbaro NM, Gutin PH, Wilson CB, Sheline GE, Boldrey EB, Wara WM: Radiation therapy in the treatment of partially resected meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1987,20(4):525-528. 10.1097/00006123-198704000-00003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldsmith BJ, Wara WM, Wilson CB, Larson DA: Postoperative irradiation for subtotally resected meningiomas. A retrospective analysis of 140 patients treated from 1967 to 1990. J Neurosurg 1994,80(2):195-201. 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0195View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mesic JB, Hanks GE, Doggett RL: The value of radiation therapy as an adjuvant to surgery in intracranial meningiomas. Am J Clin Oncol 1986,9(4):337-340. 10.1097/00000421-198608000-00013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor BW Jr, Marcus RB Jr, Friedman WA, Ballinger WE Jr, Million RR: The meningioma controversy: postoperative radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988,15(2):299-304. 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)90008-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Debus J, Wuendrich M, Pirzkall A, Hoess A, Schlegel W, Zuna I, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Wannenmacher M: High efficacy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of large base-of-skull meningiomas: long-term results. J Clin Oncol 2001,19(15):3547-3553.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Milker-Zabel S, Zabel A, Schulz-Ertner D, Schlegel W, Wannenmacher M, Debus J: Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with benign or atypical intracranial meningioma: long-term experience and prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005,61(3):809-816.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Rij CM, Oughlane-Heemsbergen WD, Ackerstaff AH, Lamers EA, Balm AJ, Rasch CR: Parotid gland sparing IMRT for head and neck cancer improves xerostomia related quality of life. Radiat Oncol 2008, 3: 41. 10.1186/1748-717X-3-41PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lips IM, Dehnad H, van Gils CH, Boeken Kruger AE, Heide UA, van Vulpen M: High-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer using daily fiducial marker-based position verification: acute and late toxicity in 331 patients. Radiat Oncol 2008, 3: 15. 10.1186/1748-717X-3-15PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menkarios C, Azria D, Laliberte B, Moscardo CL, Gourgou S, Lemanski C, Dubois JB, Ailleres N, Fenoglietto P: Optimal organ-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) regimen for the treatment of locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: a comparison of conventional and IMRT plans. Radiat Oncol 2007, 2: 41. 10.1186/1748-717X-2-41PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baumert BG, Norton IA, Davis JB: Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy vs. stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of meningioma located predominantly in the skull base. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003,57(2):580-592. 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00587-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Milker-Zabel S, Zabel-du Bois A, Huber P, Schlegel W, Debus J: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for complex-shaped meningioma of the skull base: long-term experience of a single institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007,68(3):858-863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uy NW, Woo SY, Teh BS, Mai WY, Carpenter LS, Chiu JK, Lu HH, Gildenberg P, Trask T, Grant WH, et al.: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for meningioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002,53(5):1265-1270. 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02823-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pirzkall A, Debus J, Haering P, Rhein B, Grosser KH, Hoss A, Wannenmacher M: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for recurrent, residual, or untreated skull-base meningiomas: preliminary clinical experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003,55(2):362-372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark BG, Candish C, Vollans E, Gete E, Lee R, Martin M, Ma R, McKenzie M: Optimization of stereotactic radiotherapy treatment delivery technique for base-of-skull meningiomas. Med Dosim 2008,33(3):239-247. 10.1016/j.meddos.2008.03.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sajja R, Barnett GH, Lee SY, Harnisch G, Stevens GH, Lee J, Suh JH: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for newly diagnosed and recurrent intracranial meningiomas: preliminary results. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005,4(6):675-682.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ganswindt U, Paulsen F, Corvin S, Eichhorn K, Glocker S, Hundt I, Birkner M, Alber M, Anastasiadis A, Stenzl A, et al.: Intensity modulated radiotherapy for high risk prostate cancer based on sentinel node SPECT imaging for target volume definition. BMC Cancer 2005, 5: 91. 10.1186/1471-2407-5-91PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ganswindt U, Paulsen F, Corvin S, Hundt I, Alber M, Frey B, Stenzl A, Bares R, Bamberg M, Belka C: Optimized coverage of high-risk adjuvant lymph node areas in prostate cancer using a sentinel node-based, intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007,67(2):347-355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deantonio L, Beldi D, Gambaro G, Loi G, Brambilla M, Inglese E, Krengli M: FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and radiotherapy treatment planning of head and neck carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2008, 3: 29. 10.1186/1748-717X-3-29PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rothschild S, Studer G, Seifert B, Huguenin P, Glanzmann C, Davis JB, Lutolf UM, Hany TF, Ciernik IF: PET/CT staging followed by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) improves treatment outcome of locally advanced pharyngeal carcinoma: a matched-pair comparison. Radiat Oncol 2007, 2: 22. 10.1186/1748-717X-2-22PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weber DC, Zilli T, Buchegger F, Casanova N, Haller G, Rouzaud M, Nouet P, Dipasquale G, Ratib O, Zaidi H, et al.: [(18)F]Fluoroethyltyrosine- positron emission tomography-guided radiotherapy for high-grade glioma. Radiat Oncol 2008, 3: 44. 10.1186/1748-717X-3-44PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh AK, Guion P, Sears-Crouse N, Ullman K, Smith S, Albert PS, Fichtinger G, Choyke PL, Xu S, Kruecker J, et al.: Simultaneous integrated boost of biopsy proven, MRI defined dominant intra-prostatic lesions to 95 Gray with IMRT: early results of a phase I NCI study. Radiat Oncol 2007, 2: 36. 10.1186/1748-717X-2-36PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma N, Neumann D, Macklis R: The impact of functional imaging on radiation medicine. Radiat Oncol 2008, 3: 25. 10.1186/1748-717X-3-25PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dutour A, Kumar U, Panetta R, Ouafik L, Fina F, Sasi R, Patel YC: Expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in human brain tumors. Int J Cancer 1998,76(5):620-627. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980529)76:5<620::AID-IJC2>3.0.CO;2-SView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henze M, Schuhmacher J, Hipp P, Kowalski J, Becker DW, Doll J, Macke HR, Hofmann M, Debus J, Haberkorn U: PET imaging of somatostatin receptors using [68Ga]DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide: first results in patients with meningiomas. J Nucl Med 2001,42(7):1053-1056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henze M, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Milker-Zabel S, Schuhmacher J, Strauss LG, Doll J, Macke HR, Eisenhut M, Debus J, Haberkorn U: Characterization of 68Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide kinetics in patients with meningiomas. J Nucl Med 2005,46(5):763-769.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Astner ST, Dobrei-Ciuchendea M, Essler M, Bundschuh RA, Sai H, Schwaiger M, Molls M, Weber WA, Grosu AL: Effect of 11C-methionine-positron emission tomography on gross tumor volume delineation in stereotactic radiotherapy of skull base meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008,72(4):1161-1167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grosu AL, Weber WA, Astner ST, Adam M, Krause BJ, Schwaiger M, Molls M, Nieder C: 11C-methionine PET improves the target volume delineation of meningiomas treated with stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006,66(2):339-344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rutten I, Cabay JE, Withofs N, Lemaire C, Aerts J, Baart V, Hustinx R: PET/CT of skull base meningiomas using 2-18F-fluoro-L-tyrosine: initial report. J Nucl Med 2007,48(5):720-725. 10.2967/jnumed.106.038216View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Milker-Zabel S, Zabel-du Bois A, Henze M, Huber P, Schulz-Ertner D, Hoess A, Haberkorn U, Debus J: Improved target volume definition for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with intracranial meningiomas by correlation of CT, MRI, and [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006,65(1):222-227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Astner ST, Bundschuh RA, Beer AJ, Ziegler SI, Krause BJ, Schwaiger M, Molls M, Grosu AL, Essler M: Assessment of tumor volumes in skull base glomus tumors using Gluc-Lys[(18)F]-TOCA positron emission tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009,73(4):1135-1140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schulz S, Pauli SU, Handel M, Dietzmann K, Firsching R, Hollt V: Immunohistochemical determination of five somatostatin receptors in meningioma reveals frequent overexpression of somatostatin receptor subtype sst2A. Clin Cancer Res 2000,6(5):1865-1874.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hildebrandt G, Scheidhauer K, Luyken C, Schicha H, Klug N, Dahms P, Krisch B: High sensitivity of the in vivo detection of somatostatin receptors by 111 indium (DTPA-octreotide)-scintigraphy in meningioma patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994,126(2-4):63-71. 10.1007/BF01476412View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barth A, Haldemann AR, Reubi JC, Godoy N, Rosler H, Kinser JA, Seiler RW: Noninvasive differentiation of meningiomas from other brain tumours using combined 111 Indium-octreotide/99 mtechnetium-DTPA brain scintigraphy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996,138(10):1179-1185. 10.1007/BF01809748View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nyberg G, Bergstrom M, Enblad P, Lilja A, Muhr C, Langstrom B: PET-methionine of skull base neuromas and meningiomas. Acta Otolaryngol 1997,117(4):482-489. 10.3109/00016489709113425View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ericson K, Lilja A, Bergstrom M, Collins VP, Eriksson L, Ehrin E, von Holst H, Lundqvist H, Langsrom BB, Mosskin M: Positron emission tomography with ([11C]methyl)-L-methionine, [11C]D-glucose, and [68Ga]EDTA in supratentorial tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985,9(4):683-689. 10.1097/00004728-198507010-00005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iuchi T, Iwadate Y, Namba H, Osato K, Saeki N, Yamaura A, Uchida Y: Glucose and methionine uptake and proliferative activity in meningiomas. Neurol Res 1999,21(7):640-644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.